IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] vs Softerra Adaxes comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] and Softerra Adaxes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, One Identity, Omada and others in User Provisioning Software.
To learn more, read our detailed User Provisioning Software Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The IBM prices are, as ever, extortionate, even with a business partnership, and high levels of discounts."
  • More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In User Provisioning Software
    Views
    323
    Comparisons
    223
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    User Provisioning Software
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, One Identity, Omada and others in User Provisioning Software. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tivoli Access Manager, IBM Security Access Manager
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Tivoli Access Manager is a robust and secure centralized policy management solution for e-business and distributed applications. IBM Tivoli Access Manager WebSEAL is a high performance, multi-threaded Web server that applies fine-grained security policy to the Tivoli Access Manager protected Web object space. WebSEAL can provide single sign-on solutions and incorporate back-end Web application server resources into its security policy.
    Adaxes is a management and automation solution for Active Directory, Exchange and Office 365 environments. It provides Automated Provisioning, Web Interface for AD tasks, Role-Based Access Model, Approval-Based Workflow, Self-Password Reset and much more.
    Sample Customers
    Essex Technology Group Inc.
    Tele2 Nederland, Baytex Energy Corp, EAS Energy, HeLi NET Telekommunikation GmbH & Co. KG, FUJIFILM, Vulcan Materials, Chemonics International, INIFLUX, L'Occitane Group
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government25%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Insurance Company25%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    User Provisioning Software
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, One Identity, Omada and others in User Provisioning Software. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Provisioning Software while Softerra Adaxes is ranked 12th in User Provisioning Software. IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Softerra Adaxes is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] writes "Reverse proxy means applications need only minimal changes to support SSO with ISAM". On the other hand, IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Softerra Adaxes is most compared with One Identity Active Roles, Quest Active Administrator, ManageEngine ADManager Plus, ManageEngine ADAudit Plus and SailPoint IdentityIQ.

    See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors.

    We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.