IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT vs Lansweeper comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
177 views|148 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Lansweeper Logo
2,362 views|1,511 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT and Lansweeper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Asset Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is a user-friendly solution that has a good user interface."

More IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT Pros →

"It is very flexible and very powerful. The reporting scripts that are continually posted are a real benefit. It makes it easier for someone who is a consumer, but not necessarily a power user, to quickly create and run reports, get updates, and know what tasks need to be performed.""Its functionality is very solid. The best part about it is that, when you have issues in getting information back from nodes, it tells you what the issue is, and you can quickly go to the specific nodes and respond to or repair those. There is an agent option, but to me, as a small business, the preference is to avoid agents where possible because you probably don't have the staff to keep up with them all.""Provides good reports from every asset.""One valuable feature is the ability to monitor log-on times, providing insights into whether users are rebooting their machines as claimed. This is useful in scenarios where users may not be aware of the need to reboot for system optimization. Lansweeper helps verify such information by collecting log data. Another noteworthy feature is the capability to track CPU, memory, and network usage on workstations at intervals, say every thirty minutes. This allows me to assess the user's experience and validate their claims about resource consumption. For instance, if a user complains about high memory usage, Lansweeper enables me to verify the actual usage and address the issue accurately. This level of monitoring granularity is something I find particularly useful and haven't seen in many other tools.""Lansweeper is very easy to use, and its technical support is very good.""The most valuable feature of Lansweeper is IT asset management. In the realm of cybersecurity, having knowledge of what is on the network is critical. We are able to conduct reports and see the assets we have. Initially, the solution required a machine on the local network to scan everything, but it has evolved to include agents that can report to a device, and more recently, an agent that can send data to the cloud even if the device is outside of the network. This has proven to be especially useful during the pandemic, as it has allowed us to keep track of devices that have been sent home with employees.""The solution provides inventory information that is very important to our company.""We've found the most value right now in the inventory of the equipment."

More Lansweeper Pros →

Cons
"The solution’s initial setup is complex and technical support is not good enough."

More IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT Cons →

"Lacks an end-to-end asset management tool.""The support is an area that could improve. The support staff could be more knowledgeable.""The help desk is not exactly its strong suit.""The feature to deploy software in endpoints needs to be improved.""The support experience hasn't been satisfactory. Establishing a direct connection with someone is challenging, as communication is limited to chat or forums through a web link. There's a lack of direct interaction with support personnel, making it difficult to have real-time conversations or seek immediate assistance, which is not ideal.""I don't have any complaints about it, and I've never really had any issues. It isn't wizard-driven or anything like that, but it doesn't need to be. For someone who is not familiar with system administration, it would be daunting. There would be a lot of info there. They wouldn't necessarily know what to do, but that's not its target audience. For its target audience, in particular, it doesn't need to change. It is really a good tool.""It would be great if Lansweeper could combine security functions like vulnerability management."

More Lansweeper Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is an expensive solution."
  • More IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It actually costs some money in the long run because of the licensing model."
  • "Its cost is terrific. It has a great price and is cost-effective, and the license is free under a hundred nodes. I like the fact that it gets regular updates. Of course, it notifies you of the product and you can patch it and all that, but I like the fact that it is very affordable for the number of nodes. A company with three or four computers doesn't need it, but a company that has dozens or hundreds has to have some kind of governance. It can do everything such as Windows, Linux, and network devices, and the discovery is really intelligent. For example, you'd find smart devices, IOTs, and things like that. I'm very happy with it."
  • "The Lansweeper's price has increased and is now on par with or even higher than competitors, it still offers significant value in the area of IT asset management."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Lansweeper's pricing a seven out of ten."
  • "It is not high and it is fair according to the worth it offers."
  • More Lansweeper Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is a user-friendly solution that has a good user interface.
    Top Answer:IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is an expensive solution. The solution's licensing cost depends on the number of nodes and servers. Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution.
    Top Answer:The solution’s initial setup is complex and technical support is not good enough. IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT should have a cloud-based version. IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is expensive… more »
    Top Answer:One valuable feature is the ability to monitor log-on times, providing insights into whether users are rebooting their machines as claimed. This is useful in scenarios where users may not be aware of… more »
    Top Answer:It is not high and it is fair according to the worth it offers.
    Top Answer:The support experience hasn't been satisfactory. Establishing a direct connection with someone is challenging, as communication is limited to chat or forums through a web link. There's a lack of… more »
    Ranking
    17th
    out of 48 in IT Asset Management
    Views
    177
    Comparisons
    148
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    415
    Rating
    7.0
    9th
    out of 48 in IT Asset Management
    Views
    2,362
    Comparisons
    1,511
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    646
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tivoli Asset Management for IT
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is designed to help track and manage your hardware and software IT assets, with particular emphasis on inventory, asset life-cycle management, and license management. Asset Management for IT includes inventory, asset tracking, asset reconciliation, financial management, contract management, procurement management, and, optionally, Service Level Agreement (SLA) management. This asset life-cycle functionality permits the tracking and management of IT assets through initial request, approval, procurement, contract, receipt, inventory, deployment, asset installs-moves-adds-changes (IMACs), and retirement.

    Managing IT has never been a bigger challenge. Hardware, software, and users can be anywhere at any time, making IT environments extremely dynamic and often complex. A seemingly simple question has become terribly difficult to answer: ‘Who is using what?’ This question inspired Lansweeper and still drives us today. We believe that answering it is crucial to tackle and simplify many of the challenges IT professionals face every day.

    MISSION
    At Lansweeper we develop and support our software which builds and leverages a system of record in any IT environment.

    Sample Customers
    Migros Zurich, Tyr_ns AB, Port Otago Limited, BTC, Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., AIG, Swedish Match, DTE Energy
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Government15%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise43%
    Large Enterprise14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    IT Asset Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is ranked 17th in IT Asset Management with 1 review while Lansweeper is ranked 9th in IT Asset Management with 7 reviews. IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is rated 7.0, while Lansweeper is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT writes "A user-friendly solution that has a good user interface, but its technical support is not good enough". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lansweeper writes "A powerful, cost-effective, and agentless solution that supports multiple platforms and is perfect for small and medium enterprises". IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is most compared with BigFix, ServiceNow, Microsoft Configuration Manager and BMC Helix Discovery, whereas Lansweeper is most compared with ServiceNow, ManageEngine IT Asset Management, Qualys VMDR, Spiceworks and ServiceNow Discovery.

    See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.

    We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.