We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli CDP for Files and Iron Mountain Connect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."The restoration and infrastructure is extremely reliable."
"The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"We would like to have the opportunity to omit data from being backed up. For example, we have three virtual machines, each with three disks. When running the backup, it will automatically take each disk rather than allowing us to select what data we want backed."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
Earn 20 points
IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is ranked 62nd in Backup and Recovery while Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 37th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews. IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is rated 9.0, while Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli CDP for Files writes "Restoration and infrastructure are extremely reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is most compared with Commvault Cloud, IBM Spectrum Protect, Arcserve UDP and OpenText Data Protector, whereas Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, Veeam Backup & Replication and NAKIVO Backup & Replication.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.