Compare IBM Tivoli CDP for Files vs. Quorum OnQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Commvault Logo
34,688 views|22,903 comparisons
IBM Tivoli CDP for Files Logo
404 views|314 comparisons
Quorum OnQ Logo
879 views|414 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Tivoli CDP for Files? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Commvault, Zerto and others in Backup and Recovery Software. Updated: September 2020.
437,557 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
We work with Commvault and a partner on our environment needs according to capacity, licensing, pricing, components, modules, etc. Additional costs depend on your backup needs.We have checked some other products, but we are not testing them because price-wise, Commvault is better than the other solutions.It is cheaper than Veeam.It was not very popular because of its previous cost, but they have been working on the pricing, and now anyone can afford to use Commvault. They changed the modeling criteria for their pricing. Previously, there was only the capacity modeling based on your content capacity. In this case, they would give you a license and you would have to pay it. Now, most of the environment is virtualized so you can have the best CPU, VMs, etc. You buy whatever you need and pay for what you need.We went from Veritas NetBackup to Commvault. We switched due to upfront licensing and costs. We have more visibility into what we're actually purchasing. It seemed like, overall, the cost of Commvault was cheaper.The complete license gives us options for all the features. Commvault does not license based on storage or the management components. It can integrate with any storage vendor. That means that when we are out of storage and need more, we can integrate without additional licensing. In my opinion, Commvault needs to reduce the licensing cost by 20 to 40 percent to make it cost-efficient.Commvault licensing is a perpetual license so only the support is being renewed yearly.There is a bit of cost involved with signing up the entire solution. It's not a cheap solution.

More Commvault Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
The initial expenditure for us was a little under $40,000 for the recent renewal. For the first three years after that, other than electricity, there's no cost. After that, their support contract has to be renewed annually. We spent close to $6,000, between the two offices, for support.The pricing is about $1,400 a month. It's a little bit on the higher side. But it's one of those situations where time is valuable for me. So if it costs a little bit more money for me to have a solution that just works and requires less of my day-to-day management, I'm willing to pay a little bit more.The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years.The cost is higher than other software and services, but it is an absolute must-have.When we first got the Quorum the licensing was different.We have never questioned whether it is worth it because it so obviously is a great value.

More Quorum OnQ Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery Software solutions are best for your needs.
437,557 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Veritas doesn't have manual labeling of the tape library via GUI, Commvault somehow created a backup destination other than what I assigned it. Data consistency for the backup for both the software is… more »
Top Answer: All workloads can be integrated with Commvault. If we use a new technology, Commvault integrates with it. Commvault is a data management solution with support for building the DR side of things. With… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The change in the way that Quorum processes data has made a tremendous improvement in backup and replication times. While the familiar interface remains, the underpinnings have been finely tuned and… more »
Top Answer: The initial expenditure for us was a little under $40,000 for the recent renewal. For the first three years after that, other than electricity, there's no cost. After that, their support contract has… more »
Top Answer: I would like to see iSCSI support added so that NAS storage servers could be protected. We heavily utilize NAS storage and the risk there is minimal backup options. Currently, we are backing up NAS to… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Tivoli CDP for FilesOnQ
Learn
Commvault
IBM
Quorum
Overview

Commvault can help you transform your data into a powerful strategic asset, with data protection and information management solutions that enable you to protect, access and use all of your data anywhere and anytime.

IBM Tivoli Continuous Data Protection for Files is a continuous backup software that protects your most important files. This real-time, continuous data protection solution for file servers and user endpoints automatically backs up your most critical files the moment they are saved.

Quorum onQ is the global leader in 1-click instant recovery, providing full immediate recovery of your critical systems after any storage, system or site failure. It does this by automatically maintaining up-to-date, ready-to-run virtual machine clones of your physical and virtual servers stored on a dedicated appliance – clones that will transparently take over for failed servers within minutes.

Offer
Learn more about Commvault
Learn more about IBM Tivoli CDP for Files
Learn more about Quorum OnQ
Sample Customers
Aberdeenshire Council, Acxiom, BAM Group Ireland, Catholic Education Diocese of Parramatta, CI Investments, Clifford Chance, Alliant Credit Union, American Municipal Power, American Pacific Mortgage, AstraZeneca, Dongbu Steel, Denver Health, Dow Jones, Emirates Steel, Penn State Health, Prime Healthcare, Sonic Healthcare, Sony Network Communications, TiVO, UCONN Health, The Weitz CompanyCyberian Data ProtectionLCL Bulk Transport
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider18%
Healthcare Company14%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Government9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company6%
Government6%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm33%
Healthcare Company22%
Logistics Company22%
Government11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Financial Services Firm17%
Legal Firm6%
Logistics Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise44%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business6%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise84%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business82%
Large Enterprise18%
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Commvault, Zerto and others in Backup and Recovery Software. Updated: September 2020.
437,557 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is ranked 59th in Backup and Recovery Software while Quorum OnQ is ranked 7th in Backup and Recovery Software with 11 reviews. IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is rated 0.0, while Quorum OnQ is rated 9.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quorum OnQ writes "Automatically spins up every one of the hosts after every backup and confirms the backup". IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication and IBM Spectrum Protect, whereas Quorum OnQ is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Zerto, Acronis Backup and Veeam Backup for Office 365.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery Software vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.