We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli CDP for Files and Rubrik based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."The restoration and infrastructure is extremely reliable."
"The initial setup is easy."
"We have a great success rate for backups with Rubrik and because of the ease of automating tasks, we also run periodical restores to check the quality of the backups."
"Instant recovery because it takes about 10 seconds to restore the VM from backup to production"
"Features we have requested are typically added to the next product release."
"The main benefit is that we are secured in terms of workloads. We know that if we need to restore any VMs, or even any files inside a VM, that we will succeed 100 percent. This means that we don't need to spend much time administering the backup environment because we know it is self-healing and efficient. So, we are spending that time on something else, which is always a plus."
"I haven't encountered any bugs or glitches using the solution."
"In the event of any issues or questions, the support is top-notch. We rarely need to use support, but when they are needed, they are always quick to respond and very knowledgeable."
"Rubrik is very simple to implement and setup. "
"We would like to have the opportunity to omit data from being backed up. For example, we have three virtual machines, each with three disks. When running the backup, it will automatically take each disk rather than allowing us to select what data we want backed."
"The only thing that can be improved is catering for open source databases because at the moment it doesn't cater for Mongo, MySQL, and Postgres."
"Rubrik needs to continue to listen to their customers and what they want/need, not just care about money and the bottom line."
"The price of Rubrik is too high, especially when you are considering a change in the total backup solution."
"The solution's reporting feature could be better."
"Could be improved from an analytics point of view."
"Lacks availability in a NFR format of virtual appliances to test them in public cloud environment."
"They need to find a solution for SMBs. It is currently only suitable for enterprises or big customers. They need to find a solution that suits SMBs."
"It is already very well furnished, but live mounts for Nutanix AHV would be amazing."
Earn 20 points
IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is ranked 62nd in Backup and Recovery while Rubrik is ranked 4th in Backup and Recovery with 82 reviews. IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is rated 9.0, while Rubrik is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli CDP for Files writes "Restoration and infrastructure are extremely reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik writes "Easy to use with minimal training required, innovative, good support". IBM Tivoli CDP for Files is most compared with Commvault Cloud, IBM Spectrum Protect, Arcserve UDP and OpenText Data Protector, whereas Rubrik is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault Cloud, Zerto and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain).
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.