• Home
  • IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform vs. SAP NetWeaver

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform vs SAP NetWeaver comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
SOA Governance
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform and SAP NetWeaver based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, SAP, Aurea and others in SOA Governance.
To learn more, read our detailed SOA Governance Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform?
Anonymous User
Has a good integration feature; user experience has improved, allowing users to receive reports on mobile devices
The customers have been running the old ERP EHP 6 and upgraded to ECC EHP 8, and then recently migrated to the cloud on SAP S/4 HANA together with... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It's a very expensive solution."
  • "The licensing costs are on a yearly basis."
  • "SAP NetWeaver requires a license, but I'm not sure how the licenses and payments were coordinated."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a nine to ten since it is an expensive solution."

    • More SAP NetWeaver Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SOA Governance solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about SAP NetWeaver?
    Top Answer:The human capital management module is valuable.
    Read all 16 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP NetWeaver?
    Top Answer:Software and hardware costs are typically handled by separate departments.
    Read all 9 answers   →
    What needs improvement with SAP NetWeaver?
    Top Answer:It needs more improvement in terms of user-friendliness. SAP wasn't user-friendly at all. In interacting with it, it should have a more customizable interface. The interfaces aren't user-friendly, so… more »
    Read all 16 answers   →
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 13 in SOA Governance
    Views
    132
    Comparisons
    9
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    2nd
    out of 13 in SOA Governance
    Views
    179
    Comparisons
    73
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    368
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform
    NetWeaver, SecurStore
    Learn More
    IBM
    SAP
    Overview
    IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform V6.2 (Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform) delivers an integrated offering for SOA management across the services, application, and middleware layers. Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform V6.2 combines the strength of in-depth Web services management with the management of WebSphere Application Servers, WebSphere MQ, and WebSphere Message Broker systems to deliver the information required to help meet demanding service levels required of SOA-based applications. When problems arise at the services layer, a launch-in-context capability of the application and messaging management components of Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform V6.2 makes it easy to find the root cause. IBM Tivoli delivers the out-of-the-box management that can provide a quick time-to-value for IT operations, architects, and subject matter experts.
    SAP NetWeaver is an open application platfrom that provides a comprehensive set of tools and Web services technologies that support seamless enterprise application integration, master data management (MDM), system integration, and more.
    Sample Customers
    Foedus, PLANSEE Group, hns hardware netzwerke software GmbH, Revera, BearingPoint, Sandhata Technologies Ltd., Air Canada, CMBC
    Schaidt Innovations GmbH & Co. KG, Satellites Unlimited Inc., German Football Association, FMC Corporation, Deutscher Fu_ball-Bund
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company56%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Non Tech Company11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    University10%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    SOA Governance
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, SAP, Aurea and others in SOA Governance. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform is ranked 6th in SOA Governance while SAP NetWeaver is ranked 2nd in SOA Governance with 16 reviews. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform is rated 0.0, while SAP NetWeaver is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver writes "A highly scalable solution capable of being used in enterprise-sized businesses". IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for SOA Platform is most compared with , whereas SAP NetWeaver is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite.

    See our list of best SOA Governance vendors.

    We monitor all SOA Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.