Compare IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. Savision Live Maps

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Datadog and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: August 2020.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability.

More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Pros »

This helps to centralize multiple monitoring solutions and streamline integration into ITSM.

More Savision Live Maps Pros »

Cons
The user interface was not good.

More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Cons »

Perhaps more focus can be done on the CMDB portion and bi-directional communication to the ITSM system, but this is a small portion.

More Savision Live Maps Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
2,243
Comparisons
1,998
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
183
Avg. Rating
7.0
Views
461
Comparisons
273
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
259
Avg. Rating
10.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 83% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Also Known As
Tivoli Composite Application ManagerLive Maps
Learn
IBM
Martello
Overview
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics on z/OS manages real-time problem detection, analysis, and repair to help maintain the availability, performance and general health of on-demand composite applications. it can gain in-depth diagnostic information for specific application requests to identify the root cause of problems. This software provides a consistent way to manage composite applications throughout Java EE application environments. Set alerts to help detect and fix potentially troublesome situations before they affect users. It can resolve performance issues faster and reduce downtime costs.Business Service Management Visualization & Grouping Tools for Microsoft System Centre
Offer
Learn more about IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Learn more about Savision Live Maps
Sample Customers
Michelin Tire CorpMunicipality of Alphen, Farah Leisure Parks Management LLC, Mail Technology, Austria Card, SMR Automotives
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company78%
Financial Services Firm4%
Comms Service Provider4%
Retailer3%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Datadog and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: August 2020.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is ranked 32nd in Application Performance Management (APM) with 1 review while Savision Live Maps is ranked 18th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 1 review. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is rated 7.0, while Savision Live Maps is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager writes "A stable solution with an easy setup but a poor interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Savision Live Maps writes "Helpful dashboard, and the ElasticSearch feature helps to identify problematic components". IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is most compared with BMC TrueSight Operations Management, IBM Application Performance Management, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Azure Monitor, whereas Savision Live Maps is most compared with SCOM and Splunk.

See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.