Compare IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager vs. NetIQ Access Manager

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The features that we have found most valuable with NetIQ Access Manager are its single sign-on and two factor two second factor database.
Top Answer: In terms of what could be improved, I would say the security of the infrastructure and the server and the working networking device.
Top Answer: Our primary use cases include creating the security patch, control over access, simplifying the control of the organization's access to infrastructureת and obligation services. We provide account… more »
Ranking
4th
Views
97
Comparisons
70
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
2nd
Views
314
Comparisons
178
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
400
Rating
7.5
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Tivoli Federated Identity Manager
Learn More
Overview
IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager provides web and federated single sign-on (SSO) to users across multiple applications. It uses federated SSO for security-rich information sharing for private, public and hybrid cloud deployments. With it you can enable security-rich business collaboration in the cloud.
Access Manager provides a simple yet secure and scalable solution that can handle all your web access needs both internal as well as in the cloud.
Offer
Learn more about IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager
Learn more about NetIQ Access Manager
Sample Customers
EXA Corporation
Bancomext, Bouwend Nederland, Camera dei Deputati, CGT, Coopservice Group, Court of Appeals of Georgia, Etnic, European Automotive Manufacturer, FDM Document Dynamics, Hainan Province Information Center, Highland Community College, Huntington Bank, Johnsonville Sausage, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Mazars, Mexico's Tax Administration Service, Owens Community College, Pasco Risk, RDC, School District of Hartford, Senckenberg Nature Research Society, Sheetz, Spanish Public Employment Service, SUNY Orange County Community College, Swisscard, The Municipality of Siena, The University of Westminster, UMB Financial Corporation Invests in Identity Management, University of Dayton, University of Groningen, Vodacom, World Wide Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager vs. NetIQ Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is ranked 4th in Web Access Management while NetIQ Access Manager is ranked 2nd in Web Access Management with 3 reviews. IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is rated 0.0, while NetIQ Access Manager is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetIQ Access Manager writes "Good authentication and great single sign-on feature but needs a better upgrade procedure". IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is most compared with , whereas NetIQ Access Manager is most compared with IBM Security Access Manager and Okta Workforce Identity.

See our list of best Web Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.