IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager vs NetIQ Access Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is a good solution. It's both stable and scalable."

More IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager Pros →

"The single sign-on feature is excellent.""The features that we have found most valuable with NetIQ Access Manager are its single sign-on and two factor two second factor database.""There are lots of options to customize the solution to your needs.""The most valuable features of NetIQ Access Manager are SSO and Multi-Factor Authentication.""It's very easy to integrate with applications."

More NetIQ Access Manager Pros →

Cons
"It would be better if the administration and configurations were more straightforward. The architectural level is also quite complex."

More IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager Cons →

"I would love to see the upgrade procedure handled more effectively. I would prefer to have OVS installation possibilities, although the upgrade procedures should include the OS as well. You should be able to use the whole application as an appliance.""In terms of what could be improved, I would say the security of the infrastructure and the server and the working networking device.""Classification of junctions and new versions of applications, such as APIs, can be added to enable the use of more devices that utilize biometrics for Multi-Factor Authentication to improve the solution.""Having the ability to easily extract and view and compare and version control configurations would be ideal.""The application portal could be improved with more options and easier customization."

More NetIQ Access Manager Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Our customers pay for the license every year or every three years. It's not available on a monthly basis."
  • More IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of the solution is average."
  • More NetIQ Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is a good solution. It's both stable and scalable.
    Top Answer:Our customers pay for the license every year or every three years. It's not available on a monthly basis.
    Top Answer:It would be better if the administration and configurations were more straightforward. The architectural level is also quite complex.
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of NetIQ Access Manager are SSO and Multi-Factor Authentication.
    Top Answer:The number of legacy applications and classifications has room for improvement. Classification of junctions and new versions of applications, such as APIs, can be added to enable the use of more… more »
    Top Answer:I use NetIQ Access Manager to protect one single application with Multi-Factor Authentication. The solution is deployed on both cloud and on-prem.
    Ranking
    4th
    Views
    100
    Comparisons
    43
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    305
    Rating
    8.0
    2nd
    Views
    85
    Comparisons
    58
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    842
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tivoli Federated Identity Manager
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager provides web and federated single sign-on (SSO) to users across multiple applications. It uses federated SSO for security-rich information sharing for private, public and hybrid cloud deployments. With it you can enable security-rich business collaboration in the cloud.
    Access Manager provides a simple yet secure and scalable solution that can handle all your web access needs both internal as well as in the cloud.
    Sample Customers
    EXA Corporation
    Bancomext, Bouwend Nederland, Camera dei Deputati, CGT, Coopservice Group, Court of Appeals of Georgia, Etnic, European Automotive Manufacturer, FDM Document Dynamics, Hainan Province Information Center, Highland Community College, Huntington Bank, Johnsonville Sausage, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Mazars, Mexico's Tax Administration Service, Owens Community College, Pasco Risk, RDC, School District of Hartford, Senckenberg Nature Research Society, Sheetz, Spanish Public Employment Service, SUNY Orange County Community College, Swisscard, The Municipality of Siena, The University of Westminster, UMB Financial Corporation Invests in Identity Management, University of Dayton, University of Groningen, Vodacom, World Wide Technology
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Educational Organization12%
    Government12%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise63%

    IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is ranked 4th in Web Access Management with 1 review while NetIQ Access Manager is ranked 2nd in Web Access Management with 5 reviews. IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is rated 8.0, while NetIQ Access Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager writes "A stable and scalable web security and identity management solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetIQ Access Manager writes "Multi-Factor Authentication, stable, and extremely scalable". IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is most compared with Symantec Siteminder, whereas NetIQ Access Manager is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Symantec Siteminder and Auth0.

    See our list of best Web Access Management vendors.

    We monitor all Web Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.