"IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is a good solution. It's both stable and scalable."
"The single sign-on feature is excellent."
"The features that we have found most valuable with NetIQ Access Manager are its single sign-on and two factor two second factor database."
"There are lots of options to customize the solution to your needs."
"The most valuable features of NetIQ Access Manager are SSO and Multi-Factor Authentication."
"It's very easy to integrate with applications."
"It would be better if the administration and configurations were more straightforward. The architectural level is also quite complex."
"I would love to see the upgrade procedure handled more effectively. I would prefer to have OVS installation possibilities, although the upgrade procedures should include the OS as well. You should be able to use the whole application as an appliance."
"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the security of the infrastructure and the server and the working networking device."
"Classification of junctions and new versions of applications, such as APIs, can be added to enable the use of more devices that utilize biometrics for Multi-Factor Authentication to improve the solution."
"Having the ability to easily extract and view and compare and version control configurations would be ideal."
"The application portal could be improved with more options and easier customization."
More IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is ranked 4th in Web Access Management with 1 review while NetIQ Access Manager is ranked 2nd in Web Access Management with 5 reviews. IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is rated 8.0, while NetIQ Access Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager writes "A stable and scalable web security and identity management solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetIQ Access Manager writes "Multi-Factor Authentication, stable, and extremely scalable". IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is most compared with Symantec Siteminder, whereas NetIQ Access Manager is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Symantec Siteminder and Auth0.
See our list of best Web Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Web Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.