IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager vs Oracle Access Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is a good solution. It's both stable and scalable."

More IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager Pros →

"Excellent SSO solution for Oracle products.""The most valuable features of Oracle Access Manager are the single sign-on capability and is a very robust platform. It can take a high number of authentication, and authorization requests. It's very flexible.""The MFA is the most valuable aspect.""My company has used most features of Oracle Access Manager for various implementations, but the most helpful feature of the solution for the business and customers is single sign-on.""Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.""Once it is set up, it is easy to use and it integrates with most of the products on the market.""The product allows customization via custom code.""In general, the customization that is offered is very good. The company that I am working with currently is using this feature quite extensively."

More Oracle Access Manager Pros →

Cons
"It would be better if the administration and configurations were more straightforward. The architectural level is also quite complex."

More IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager Cons →

"In the next release, they should focus more on use cases related to customer access management, customer identity, and access management.""The initial implementation can definitely be improved because you have to work on several components to configure it correctly.""The performance of Oracle Access Manager could be improved. It should be quick to install, but it wasn't, so this is another area for improvement. The Oracle Access Manager console also has room for improvement because it's slow.""The technical support is not very good at all.""There are problems with stability.""The product is complicated and difficult to install and configure.""There could be some improvements in the documentation and overall knowledge base of the solution.""The pricing of the solution is in need of improvement. Oracle products are very expensive."

More Oracle Access Manager Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Our customers pay for the license every year or every three years. It's not available on a monthly basis."
  • More IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Can be expensive as a solution."
  • "The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."
  • "On a scale where one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the solution a one. Purchasing a license for the solution is very expensive now."
  • "The product is a little expensive."
  • More Oracle Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is a good solution. It's both stable and scalable.
    Top Answer:Our customers pay for the license every year or every three years. It's not available on a monthly basis.
    Top Answer:It would be better if the administration and configurations were more straightforward. The architectural level is also quite complex.
    Top Answer:The product must improve multi-factor authentication. Multi-factor authentication requires a lot of processes and technicalities. It also involves a lot of costs.
    Ranking
    4th
    Views
    101
    Comparisons
    43
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    305
    Rating
    8.0
    11th
    out of 37 in Access Management
    Views
    1,000
    Comparisons
    640
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    472
    Rating
    7.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tivoli Federated Identity Manager
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager provides web and federated single sign-on (SSO) to users across multiple applications. It uses federated SSO for security-rich information sharing for private, public and hybrid cloud deployments. With it you can enable security-rich business collaboration in the cloud.
    Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.
    Sample Customers
    EXA Corporation
    SekerBank, University of Melbourne
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise24%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise77%

    IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is ranked 4th in Web Access Management with 1 review while Oracle Access Manager is ranked 11th in Access Management with 15 reviews. IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is rated 8.0, while Oracle Access Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager writes "A stable and scalable web security and identity management solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Access Manager writes "A convenient solution that supports customization and provides many features in a single suite". IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is most compared with Symantec Siteminder, whereas Oracle Access Manager is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, ForgeRock, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) and Auth0.

    We monitor all Web Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.