Compare IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager vs. P2 Security maXecurity
Ranking  | |
Views 113 Comparisons 80 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 18 Comparisons 1 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 50% of the time.  Compared 50% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
| Tivoli Federated Identity Manager | maXecurity |
Learn | |
| IBM | P2 Security Video Not Available |
Overview | |
| IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager provides web and federated single sign-on (SSO) to users across multiple applications. It uses federated SSO for security-rich information sharing for private, public and hybrid cloud deployments. With it you can enable security-rich business collaboration in the cloud. | The maXecurity products are appliance-based solutions that offer a new and fundamentally different approach to Web Access Management (WAM). The maXecurity products slash initial and recurring costs, making effective and secure WAM practical for organizations of all sizes. |
Offer | |
Learn more about IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager | Learn more about P2 Security maXecurity |
Sample Customers | |
| EXA Corporation | QTel Solutions |
IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is ranked 3rd in Web Access Management while P2 Security maXecurity is ranked 9th in Web Access Management. IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is rated 0.0, while P2 Security maXecurity is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager is most compared with Symantec Siteminder and Siemens DirX Access WAM, whereas P2 Security maXecurity is most compared with .
See our list of best Web Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Web Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.