IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager vs Puppet Enterprise comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The main thing that we noticed when we switched from the enterprise version to the community version was the difference in cost — the infrastructure is pretty expensive."
  • "Depending on the size of the organization there is a point when the price of Puppet Enterprise should be lower. However, they provide really good functionality, features, and capabilities."
  • "Puppet Enterprise’s pricing is competitive."
  • "Puppet Enterprise can be an expensive solution for smaller businesses."
  • More Puppet Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cluster Provisioning solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Puppet Enterprise is a stable solution.
    Top Answer:Puppet Enterprise can be an expensive solution for smaller businesses.
    Top Answer:Puppet Enterprise should improve the general extensibility for places where they can't install it.
    Ranking
    7th
    Views
    4
    Comparisons
    4
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Cluster Provisioning
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tivoli Provisioning Manager
    Puppet
    Learn More
    Overview
    Tivoli Provisioning Manager helps organizations optimize efficiency, accuracy and service delivery by automating best practices for data center provisioning activities.

    Puppet Data Center Automation helps sysadmins automate configuration and management of machines and the software running on them. With our software, businesses can make rapid, repeatable changes and automatically enforce the consistency of systems and devices, across physical and virtual machines, on prem or in the cloud.

    Sample Customers
    KPJ Healthcare Berhad, Keyword, Tennis Australia, Cxense ASA, SKIData AG, Unisys, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd, RAVInvest, Odin, Chapman University, CloudHesive, Cima Solutions Group, Projetech, Grow Strategy
    Los Alamos National Laboratory, GitHub, IP Commerce, Cedexis, Spiceworks, Server Density, Swisstopo, Chockstone, Constant Contact, NICS, Citrix
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization40%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business69%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise23%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise46%
    Large Enterprise44%

    IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager is ranked 7th in Cluster Provisioning while Puppet Enterprise doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Cluster Provisioning with 12 reviews. IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager is rated 0.0, while Puppet Enterprise is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Puppet Enterprise writes "A set-it-and-forget-it management solution". IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager is most compared with AutoSys Workload Automation and Control-M, whereas Puppet Enterprise is most compared with Red Hat Satellite, AWS Systems Manager, Microsoft Configuration Manager, BigFix and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.

    We monitor all Cluster Provisioning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.