We performed a comparison between IBM Trusteer and InAuth based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."The features were pretty straightforward. I just used them as I went along with very little interference all the years that I have used it."
"InAuth is a stable and scalable solution that supports many devices and platforms such as Samsung, LG, etc. It also has very reasonable pricing."
"I would like them to make it as user-friendly as possible. Simplicity is what we need. Load and go."
"After a Windows update, it started acting up. It blocked several programs. It became inactive after the Windows update and I had to remove Trusteer, allowing my computer to go back to its norm."
"The initial setup for InAuth could be improved, as it's not straightforward. Weak connectivity issues and user-friendliness are also areas for improvement for this solution."
IBM Trusteer is ranked 12th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while InAuth is ranked 30th in Fraud Detection and Prevention. IBM Trusteer is rated 9.0, while InAuth is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Trusteer writes "The features were pretty straightforward". On the other hand, the top reviewer of InAuth writes "Scalable and stable device identification and analysis solution for fraud detection, with reasonable pricing". IBM Trusteer is most compared with BioCatch, IBM Safer Payments, ThreatMetrix, F5 Shape Security and Guardian Analytics Fraud Detection, whereas InAuth is most compared with ThreatMetrix and iovation FraudForce.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.