Compare IBM Watson Content Hub vs. SharePoint
Most Helpful Review | |||
Use IBM Watson Content Hub? Share your opinion. |
| ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Liferay, Oracle and others in Web Content Management. Updated: January 2021. 455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | "The pricing works for us." "For this type of solution, it is not wise to buy it without Software Assurance." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs. 455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 375 Comparisons 302 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 33,923 Comparisons 28,498 Reviews 17 Average Words per Review 360 Rating 7.8 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 52% of the time.  Compared 48% of the time. | Compared 11% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time. Compared 6% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| IBM Web Content Manager, Watson Content Hub | SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010 |
Learn | |
| IBM | Microsoft |
Overview | |
| The Watson Content Hub gives business owners the power to create iconic, robust and consistent brand experiences using cloud-based, cognitive content management capabilities. Marketing and merchandising professionals can quickly select content to create relevant offers delivered across multiple channels, such as mobile, web-based or email, including those delivered by IBM Campaign Automation and IBM Digital Commerce. | SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow. Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around. |
Offer | |
Learn more about IBM Watson Content Hub | Learn more about SharePoint |
Sample Customers | |
| Factor-y S.r.l., Cochlear Limited, Amadori Group, Superior Group, Department of Justice | Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara. |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Financial Services Firm14% Energy/Utilities Company10% University10% Comms Service Provider8% Computer Software Company25% Comms Service Provider14% Government11% Manufacturing Company5% |
Company Size | |
No Data Available | Small Business38% Midsize Enterprise21% Large Enterprise41% Small Business4% Midsize Enterprise25% Large Enterprise71% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Liferay, Oracle and others in Web Content Management. Updated: January 2021.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM Watson Content Hub is ranked 20th in Web Content Management while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Web Content Management with 16 reviews. IBM Watson Content Hub is rated 0.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Plan, plan, plan. Over-budget". IBM Watson Content Hub is most compared with Drupal and WordPress, whereas SharePoint is most compared with WordPress, Citrix ShareFile, Box, OpenText Content Suite Platform and OpenText Documentum.
See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.