"It was easy to understand, easy to configure, and easy to use."
"Useful text-to-speech and speech-to-text features."
"The quality needs to be updated. For speech to text, support for additional languages can be included. For example, support for the large markets in Eastern Europe, such as Polish or Romanian, would be nice."
"Lacks a voice recording option."
Earn 20 points
IBM Watson Speech To Text is ranked 4th in Speech-To-Text Services while Microsoft Azure Speech Service is ranked 2nd in Speech-To-Text Services with 1 review. IBM Watson Speech To Text is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Azure Speech Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Watson Speech To Text writes "Easy to understand, configure, and use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Speech Service writes "Very useful and helpful text-to-speech and speech-to-text features". IBM Watson Speech To Text is most compared with Google Cloud Speech-to-Text, AssemblyAI and Amazon Transcribe, whereas Microsoft Azure Speech Service is most compared with Amazon Polly, Google Cloud Speech-to-Text, Amazon Transcribe and Google Cloud Text-to-Speech.
See our list of best Speech-To-Text Services vendors.
We monitor all Speech-To-Text Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
