Compare IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix

IBM WebSphere Application Server is ranked 2nd in Application Server with 4 reviews while TIBCO ActiveMatrix is ranked 11th in Application Server. IBM WebSphere Application Server is rated 8.2, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix is rated 0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Application Server writes "Enables us to to integrate with IBM MQ and IBM Integration Bus, in a mixed Windows/AIX environment". On the other hand, IBM WebSphere Application Server is most compared with Oracle WebLogic Server, JBoss and Tomcat, whereas TIBCO ActiveMatrix is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite, Oracle Fusion Middleware and Oracle WebLogic Server.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use TIBCO ActiveMatrix? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: November 2019.
382,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
I don't remember the price, but there are no additional costs.There is an Eclipse Plugin provided by IBM, so no need to buy IBM Rational Application Developer or Rational Software Architect tools.If your application is just a web app that does not need to scale big, you can obtain a single core license of WAS Express edition, which has almost the same features with limited processing cores. If you manage a very big application farm (i.e. need to run 10 or more WAS servers) it is better to get IBM WAS Hypervisor Edition.IBM WAS base is part of the deal when you purchase IBM FileNet P8 Content Engine.Room for improvement would only be in the licensing. As with all IBM products the licensing can be complex and expensive. Bargain well and try to get as much discount as possible. Discounts of 85% are possible. Without the discount, I think the product is overrated.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
382,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd
out of 22 in Application Server
Views
5,530
Comparisons
4,598
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
430
Avg. Rating
8.3
11th
out of 22 in Application Server
Views
766
Comparisons
682
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere Application ServerActiveMatrix
Learn
IBM
TIBCO
Overview
IBM WebSphere Application Server provides a range of flexible, secure, Java EE 7 runtime environments available on premises or across any public, private or hybrid cloud.TIBCO ActiveMatrix provides tools for developing and packaging distributed applications, a distributed service execution environment, and tools for managing the runtime environment, applications and the services the applications provide. Service Grid is a comprehensive SOA development platform that transform business logic written in different programming languages into re-usable SOA services, and then assemble those services into powerful composite applications. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid is a scalable and extensible platform for developing, deploying, and managing applications that conform to a service-oriented architecture.
Offer
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Application Server
Learn more about TIBCO ActiveMatrix
Sample Customers
TalkTalk, Property management group, E.SUN Bank, Ohio National Financial Services, Aviarc, Cincom Systems, FJA-US, D+H, Staples, Michigan Municipal LeagueVodafone Hutchison Australia (VHA)
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company44%
Government15%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm8%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: November 2019.
382,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email