We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: October 2021.
542,721 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We pay around $200,000 annually.""The price of this product is higher than that of competitors.""We used to pay about $100,000-$120,000 US or somewhere around there. That was a bit cost-prohibitive for us to continue.""It is very expensive.""The price of IBM WebSphere Application Server could be less expensive and there is an annual license required for this solution."

More IBM WebSphere Application Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
542,721 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It does integrate well with the Tivoli Federated Identity Management system.
Top Answer: We used to pay about $100,000-$120,000 US or somewhere around there. That was a bit cost-prohibitive for us to continue. You need to pay for both software licenses and software support, which was the… more »
Top Answer: I'm not certain if the WebSphere solution was deployed by IBM. There are a lot of complexities in how the solution was actually built and deployed, which means troubleshooting on management for us is… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
5,176
Comparisons
4,160
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
549
Rating
7.2
Views
66
Comparisons
48
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere Application Server
ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Learn More
Overview
IBM WebSphere Application Server provides a range of flexible, secure, Java EE 7 runtime environments available on premises or across any public, private or hybrid cloud.
Service Grid is a comprehensive SOA development platform that lets you transform business logic written in different programming languages into re-usable SOA services, and then assemble those services into powerful composite applications.
Offer
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Application Server
Learn more about TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid
Sample Customers
TalkTalk, Property management group, E.SUN Bank, Ohio National Financial Services, Aviarc, Cincom Systems, FJA-US, D+H, Staples, Michigan Municipal League
Alestra, E-Plus, T-Mobile USA, Vodafone Hutchison Australia
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company20%
Government20%
Financial Services Firm20%
Manufacturing Company20%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider16%
Insurance Company6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise59%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: October 2021.
542,721 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM WebSphere Application Server is ranked 6th in Application Infrastructure with 8 reviews while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid is ranked 31st in Application Infrastructure. IBM WebSphere Application Server is rated 7.2, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Application Server writes "Bad documentation, does not scale well, and has a lot of complexities". On the other hand, IBM WebSphere Application Server is most compared with JBoss, Tomcat, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Oracle WebLogic Server and IBM BPM, whereas TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Grid is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.