Compare IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. TIBCO ActiveSpaces Transactions

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use TIBCO ActiveSpaces Transactions? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: September 2020.
437,557 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
The price of this product is higher than that of competitors.We pay around $200,000 annually.I don't remember the price, but there are no additional costs.

More IBM WebSphere Application Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
437,557 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: We needed this type of integration and WebShepere is the best tool for it.
Top Answer: The product is very expensive because PVU has to be calculated on maximun virtual cores and there is no difference between production and non-production environments.
Top Answer: Cloud service offering should be improved because the future is in the utilization of the PaaS provided by principal cloud providers; I mean that it would be very useful to have the possibility to use… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
2nd
out of 23 in Application Server
Views
5,307
Comparisons
4,319
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
362
Avg. Rating
7.7
17th
out of 23 in Application Server
Views
72
Comparisons
36
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere Application ServerActiveSpaces Transactions
Learn
IBM
TIBCO
Overview
IBM WebSphere Application Server provides a range of flexible, secure, Java EE 7 runtime environments available on premises or across any public, private or hybrid cloud.TIBCO ActiveSpaces Transactions is a fully distributed, in-memory transactional application server for Java that powers event-driven business-critical systems demanding the highest levels of performance and availability with a single, unified platform and dramatically reduced overall costs. Its 'always-on' high availability provides for low-latency fault-tolerant systems and fail-over that is transparent to applications with data, service, and transactional consistency maintained no databases required. ActiveSpaces Transactions delivers this power and extreme scalability while running on commodity hardware and open systems.
Offer
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Application Server
Learn more about TIBCO ActiveSpaces Transactions
Sample Customers
TalkTalk, Property management group, E.SUN Bank, Ohio National Financial Services, Aviarc, Cincom Systems, FJA-US, D+H, Staples, Michigan Municipal LeagueCitihub, Colonial Life, ING SW Europe, U.S. National Archives
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Government29%
Manufacturing Company29%
Financial Services Firm14%
Healthcare Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company8%
Government8%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: September 2020.
437,557 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM WebSphere Application Server is ranked 2nd in Application Server with 7 reviews while TIBCO ActiveSpaces Transactions is ranked 17th in Application Server. IBM WebSphere Application Server is rated 7.8, while TIBCO ActiveSpaces Transactions is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Application Server writes "Valuable connection management and scalability but is quite expensive". On the other hand, IBM WebSphere Application Server is most compared with JBoss, Tomcat, IBM BPM, Oracle WebLogic Server and IIS, whereas TIBCO ActiveSpaces Transactions is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Server vendors.

We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.