Compare IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. TIBCO ActiveSpaces Transactions

IBM WebSphere Application Server is ranked 3rd in Application Server with 5 reviews while TIBCO ActiveSpaces Transactions is ranked 17th in Application Server. IBM WebSphere Application Server is rated 8.0, while TIBCO ActiveSpaces Transactions is rated 0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Application Server writes "Enables us to to integrate with IBM MQ and IBM Integration Bus, in a mixed Windows/AIX environment". On the other hand, IBM WebSphere Application Server is most compared with Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat and JBoss, whereas TIBCO ActiveSpaces Transactions is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use TIBCO ActiveSpaces Transactions? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. Magic xpa Application Platform and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
I don't remember the price, but there are no additional costs.There is an Eclipse Plugin provided by IBM, so no need to buy IBM Rational Application Developer or Rational Software Architect tools.If your application is just a web app that does not need to scale big, you can obtain a single core license of WAS Express edition, which has almost the same features with limited processing cores. If you manage a very big application farm (i.e. need to run 10 or more WAS servers) it is better to get IBM WAS Hypervisor Edition.IBM WAS base is part of the deal when you purchase IBM FileNet P8 Content Engine.Room for improvement would only be in the licensing. As with all IBM products the licensing can be complex and expensive. Bargain well and try to get as much discount as possible. Discounts of 85% are possible. Without the discount, I think the product is overrated.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
3rd
out of 22 in Application Server
Views
5,508
Comparisons
4,568
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
430
Avg. Rating
8.3
17th
out of 22 in Application Server
Views
79
Comparisons
40
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere Application ServerActiveSpaces Transactions
Learn
IBM
TIBCO
Overview
IBM WebSphere Application Server provides a range of flexible, secure, Java EE 7 runtime environments available on premises or across any public, private or hybrid cloud.TIBCO ActiveSpaces Transactions is a fully distributed, in-memory transactional application server for Java that powers event-driven business-critical systems demanding the highest levels of performance and availability with a single, unified platform and dramatically reduced overall costs. Its 'always-on' high availability provides for low-latency fault-tolerant systems and fail-over that is transparent to applications with data, service, and transactional consistency maintained no databases required. ActiveSpaces Transactions delivers this power and extreme scalability while running on commodity hardware and open systems.
Offer
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Application Server
Learn more about TIBCO ActiveSpaces Transactions
Sample Customers
TalkTalk, Property management group, E.SUN Bank, Ohio National Financial Services, Aviarc, Cincom Systems, FJA-US, D+H, Staples, Michigan Municipal LeagueCitihub, Colonial Life, ING SW Europe, U.S. National Archives
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company45%
Government15%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm8%
No Data Available
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.