IBM WebSphere BPMS vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere BPMS and Microsoft System Center Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Mohamed-Abdelwahed
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good.""We like the feature in which we can trace back instances.""This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."

More IBM WebSphere BPMS Pros →

"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution.""It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."

More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Pros →

Cons
"The solution lacks acceptable stability.""The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further.""Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."

More IBM WebSphere BPMS Cons →

"The product's management aspect needs enhancement.""I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."

More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I give the cost of the solution a five out of ten."
  • "We obtained a license that bundled Windows Server with System Center at no additional cost."
  • More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution.
    Top Answer:I give the cost of the solution a five out of ten.
    Top Answer:I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic. The table it uses to power my scripts is not very user-friendly.
    Ranking
    31st
    out of 64 in Process Automation
    Views
    123
    Comparisons
    87
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    26th
    out of 64 in Process Automation
    Views
    1,600
    Comparisons
    446
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    355
    Rating
    6.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WebSphere BPMS
    MS System Center Orchestrator
    Learn More
    Overview
    Information Not Available

    As an IT administrator, you probably perform a lot of tasks and procedures to keep your computing environment healthy. You may have automated individual tasks, but typically, not the whole process. With System Center - Orchestrator you tie disparate tasks and procedures together using a graphical user interface Runbook Designer to create reliable, flexible, and efficient end-to-end solutions in your IT environment.

    Sample Customers
    Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Process Automation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM WebSphere BPMS is ranked 31st in Process Automation while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is ranked 26th in Process Automation with 2 reviews. IBM WebSphere BPMS is rated 6.6, while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere BPMS writes "Standardizes and automates business processes for efficiency ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator writes "Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location ". IBM WebSphere BPMS is most compared with , whereas Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is most compared with Camunda, Ivanti Automation, ServiceNow Orchestration, OpenText Operations Orchestration and vCenter Orchestrator.

    See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.