We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere BPMS and Microsoft System Center Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."
"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."
More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM WebSphere BPMS is ranked 31st in Process Automation while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is ranked 26th in Process Automation with 2 reviews. IBM WebSphere BPMS is rated 6.6, while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere BPMS writes "Standardizes and automates business processes for efficiency ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator writes "Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location ". IBM WebSphere BPMS is most compared with , whereas Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is most compared with Camunda, Ivanti Automation, ServiceNow Orchestration, OpenText Operations Orchestration and vCenter Orchestrator.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.