We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere BPMS and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
IBM WebSphere BPMS is ranked 33rd in Process Automation while WorkflowGen is ranked 34th in Process Automation. IBM WebSphere BPMS is rated 6.6, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere BPMS writes "Standardizes and automates business processes for efficiency ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". IBM WebSphere BPMS is most compared with , whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with .
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
