IBM WebSphere CloudBurst [EOL] vs JBoss Enterprise Application Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere CloudBurst [EOL] and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "It is an open-source solution."
  • More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Application Infrastructure
    Views
    2,951
    Comparisons
    2,557
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    270
    Rating
    9.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WebSphere CloudBurst
    JBoss EAP, Red Hat EAP
    Learn More
    Overview
    The IBM WebSphere CloudBurst Appliance enables you to construct, deploy, and maintain WebSphere Application Server virtual systems in a private cloud. In order to manage the entire lifecycle of these systems in a private cloud, WebSphere CloudBurst offers multiple administration interfaces, including a rich Web 2.0 interface for GUI-based administration activities, and a command line interface (CLI) that enables a scripted, automated administration approach.
    Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is an open source platform for modern Java applications deployed in any environment. JBoss EAP’s architecture is modular, and cloud ready. The platform offers powerful management and automation for greater developer productivity. It is based on the open source Wildfly project (formerly known as JBoss Application Server).
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    APD, Banco Azteca, Roche, Tata Sky, Frost Bank
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Government7%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Infrastructure
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM WebSphere CloudBurst [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure while JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 9th in Application Infrastructure with 5 reviews. IBM WebSphere CloudBurst [EOL] is rated 0.0, while JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "A stable and scalable solution that provides excellent technical support with a good response time". IBM WebSphere CloudBurst [EOL] is most compared with , whereas JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with IBM WebSphere Application Server, Microsoft .NET Framework, Apache Web Server, IBM BPM and NGINX Plus.

    See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

    We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.