• Home
  • IBM WebSphere CloudBurst [EOL] vs. Windows Process Activation Services

IBM WebSphere CloudBurst [EOL] vs Windows Process Activation Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere CloudBurst [EOL] and Windows Process Activation Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use IBM WebSphere CloudBurst [EOL]?
Anonymous User
Central console enables us to see all of the activated and deactivated computers but it has poor alerts and frustrating technical support
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Infrastructure
23rd
out of 36 in Application Infrastructure
Views
232
Comparisons
180
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere CloudBurst
Learn More
IBM
Microsoft
Overview
The IBM WebSphere CloudBurst Appliance enables you to construct, deploy, and maintain WebSphere Application Server virtual systems in a private cloud. In order to manage the entire lifecycle of these systems in a private cloud, WebSphere CloudBurst offers multiple administration interfaces, including a rich Web 2.0 interface for GUI-based administration activities, and a command line interface (CLI) that enables a scripted, automated administration approach.
Windows Process Activation Service generalizes the Internet Information Services (IIS) process model, removing the dependency on HTTP. All the features of IIS that were previously available only to HTTP applications are now available to applications hosting Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) services, by using non-HTTP protocols. IIS 7.0 also uses Windows Process Activation Service for message-based activation over HTTP.
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Harris Farm Markets, The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA), Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council, John Keells Holdings, Green Prefab, 343 Industries, SM Prime, Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System Ltd.
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM WebSphere CloudBurst [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure while Windows Process Activation Services is ranked 23rd in Application Infrastructure. IBM WebSphere CloudBurst [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Windows Process Activation Services is rated 4.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Process Activation Services writes "Central console enables us to see all of the activated and deactivated computers but it has poor alerts and frustrating technical support". IBM WebSphere CloudBurst [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Windows Process Activation Services is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework and IIS.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.