• Home
  • IBM WebSphere Integration Developer vs. Windows Process Activation Services

IBM WebSphere Integration Developer vs Windows Process Activation Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere Integration Developer and Windows Process Activation Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use IBM WebSphere Integration Developer?
Anonymous User
Central console enables us to see all of the activated and deactivated computers but it has poor alerts and frustrating technical support
Ranking
26th
out of 36 in Application Infrastructure
Views
90
Comparisons
82
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
23rd
out of 36 in Application Infrastructure
Views
232
Comparisons
180
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere Integration Developer
Learn More
IBM
Microsoft
Overview
WebSphere Integration Developer (WID) is an integrated development environment for building applications based on service-oriented architecture (SOA).
Windows Process Activation Service generalizes the Internet Information Services (IIS) process model, removing the dependency on HTTP. All the features of IIS that were previously available only to HTTP applications are now available to applications hosting Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) services, by using non-HTTP protocols. IIS 7.0 also uses Windows Process Activation Service for message-based activation over HTTP.
Sample Customers
The City of Edinburgh Council, Factor-y S.r.l., Alleyoop Inc., Dow Chemical Company, Airbus, Wittmann EDV-Systeme, The Chevrolet Volt, Federal Employment Agency, Web Business Consulting, Rosenthal & Rosenthal
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Harris Farm Markets, The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA), Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council, John Keells Holdings, Green Prefab, 343 Industries, SM Prime, Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System Ltd.
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM WebSphere Integration Developer is ranked 26th in Application Infrastructure while Windows Process Activation Services is ranked 23rd in Application Infrastructure. IBM WebSphere Integration Developer is rated 0.0, while Windows Process Activation Services is rated 4.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Process Activation Services writes "Central console enables us to see all of the activated and deactivated computers but it has poor alerts and frustrating technical support". IBM WebSphere Integration Developer is most compared with E2E Bridge, whereas Windows Process Activation Services is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework and IIS.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.