Compare IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IIS Logo
Read 10 IIS reviews.
3,953 views|3,274 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,670 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
We only use the basic features, but the most valuable one for us is the Publish-subscribe pattern.Performance-wise, this solution is really good.It has many interfaces and you can connect to any backend source that has another format, and convert it to the desired format.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pros »

The solution is very stable. The solution is very simple and easy to use.Microsoft's technical support has always been very good.What I like the most is that it is easy to use.The solution is very easy to use and offers a quick deployment.The solution is easy to use and connects with Microsoft.The solution integrates well with most Microsoft products.The graphical user interface makes it easy for users to configure the sites.The solution is easy to use, easy to maintain and isn't too technical.

More IIS Pros »

Cons
Technical support is very slow and needs to be improved.The images and size of the containers are too big and I think that they should be more lightweight.The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Cons »

The level of technical support the solution offers could be improved.The documentation isn't very good and the options are very complex.In the next release, I would like to see better integration between the cloud environment and the on-premises environment.We've never had any issues with the solution, but it's still nice to have overall improvements on it. It could be easier and faster to use, for example.The documentation is not very detailed. They need to improve it and add to it. They should ensure there are lots of visuals to help users better understand the solution.If Microsoft IIS could work well with AppOptics or things like PHP, Python, and other custom languages that run on the webserver, it would be ideal. I think there are cases where people need to use Apache instead of IIS when IIS doesn't work well with other web languages.This solution needs to be easier for cases where you want to have an IIS cluster.The solution should improve the cluster environment and load balancing.

More IIS Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The price is very high and it's the main reason that we are searching for alternatives.This product is more expensive than competing products.IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pricing and Cost Advice »

The price of the cloud system is a bit high.This solution comes included with Windows Server.

More IIS Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
431,670 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
2,865
Comparisons
2,458
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
499
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
3,953
Comparisons
3,274
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
307
Avg. Rating
7.6
Popular Comparisons
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Also Known As
WebSphere Message BrokerWindows Server IIS
Learn
IBM
Microsoft
Overview
WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.Internet Information Services (IIS) provides a secure, easy-to-manage, modular and extensible platform for reliably hosting websites, services and applications. With IIS, you get choice and control without giving up reliability or security.
Offer
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Learn more about IIS
Sample Customers
WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin TireErste Bank Group, NJVC, Samsung Electronics, Sheraton Hotels and Resorts, Tata Steel Europe, Urban Software Institute
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider14%
Insurance Company11%
Media Company6%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider29%
Transportation Company29%
Consumer Goods Company14%
Aerospace/Defense Firm14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider17%
Media Company10%
Government7%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,670 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM WebSphere Message Broker is ranked 12th in Application Infrastructure with 3 reviews while IIS is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 10 reviews. IBM WebSphere Message Broker is rated 7.6, while IIS is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Message Broker writes "Mature, reliable, and performance-wise it is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IIS writes "A stable solution for our customer's websites or internal applications". IBM WebSphere Message Broker is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, IBM DataPower Gateway, Mule ESB and IBM BPM, whereas IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat, Apache Web Server and IBM WebSphere Application Server. See our IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. IIS report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.