• Home
  • IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. InterSystems Ensemble

IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs InterSystems Ensemble comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Read 11 IBM WebSphere Message Broker reviews
586 views|505 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
InterSystems Logo

InterSystems Ensemble

Read 1 InterSystems Ensemble review
91 views|50 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere Message Broker and InterSystems Ensemble based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
A stable and scalable tool for data transformation and enrichment
It's a routing solution. Irrespective of protocols, we can route the source through the destination.
Anonymous User
We use the solution for web services.
We have been using Ensemble from the beginning, so I cannot compare the situation before and after its use.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost."
  • "The price is very high and it's the main reason that we are searching for alternatives."
  • "This product is more expensive than competing products."
  • "I feel with IBM, when you want certain functions or features, you have to continuously purchase add-ons. There are always additional fees."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "The solution is expensive."

    • More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about IBM WebSphere Message Broker?
    Top Answer:It is a scalable solution...The setup is easy.
    Read all 12 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM WebSphere Mes...
    Top Answer:The solution is expensive. I give the cost a one out of ten. We pay for an annual license.
    Read all 8 answers   →
    What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Message Broker?
    Top Answer:Stability and pricing are areas with shortcomings that need improvement.
    Read all 11 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    10th
    out of 36 in Application Infrastructure
    Views
    586
    Comparisons
    505
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    384
    Rating
    8.4
    32nd
    out of 36 in Application Infrastructure
    Views
    91
    Comparisons
    50
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WebSphere Message Broker
    Ensemble
    Learn More
    IBM
    InterSystems
    Overview
    WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.
    Integration platform that includes an enterprise service bus along with business process management, event processing and data analytics.
    Sample Customers
    WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin Tire
    CysNET, Pennine Acute Hospitals, Kettering Health Network, Objectway, WS trends, Ontario Systems, Assurenet, 3M, Northgate Public Services, CentraCare
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company9%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization71%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Healthcare Company5%
    Comms Service Provider3%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Large Enterprise80%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise74%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise76%
    Large Enterprise19%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Infrastructure
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM WebSphere Message Broker is ranked 10th in Application Infrastructure with 11 reviews while InterSystems Ensemble is ranked 32nd in Application Infrastructure. IBM WebSphere Message Broker is rated 7.8, while InterSystems Ensemble is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Message Broker writes "For new applications that are being onboarded, we engage this tool so the data can flow as required but there's some lag in the GUI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of InterSystems Ensemble writes "We use the solution for web services". IBM WebSphere Message Broker is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Mule ESB, IBM DataPower Gateway and IBM BPM, whereas InterSystems Ensemble is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform and Mule ESB.

    See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

    We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.