Compare IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

IBM WebSphere Message Broker is ranked 12th in Application Infrastructure with 2 reviews while JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 14th in Application Infrastructure with 1 review. IBM WebSphere Message Broker is rated 8.0, while JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Message Broker writes "Mature, reliable, and performance-wise it is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "Good performance and scalability for our online transaction processing". IBM WebSphere Message Broker is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, IBM DataPower Gateway, Mule ESB and IBM BPM, whereas JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with NGINX Plus, Microsoft .NET Framework, IBM WebSphere Application Server, Apache Web Server and Zend PHP Engine.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: July 2020.
430,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Performance-wise, this solution is really good.It has many interfaces and you can connect to any backend source that has another format, and convert it to the desired format.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pros »

The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance.

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pros »

Cons
The images and size of the containers are too big and I think that they should be more lightweight.The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Cons »

This solution needs better management UI.

More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
This product is more expensive than competing products.IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
430,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
2,865
Comparisons
2,458
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
499
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
788
Comparisons
701
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
92
Avg. Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere Message BrokerJBoss EAP, Red Hat EAP
Learn
IBM
Red Hat
Overview
WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is an open source platform for modern Java applications deployed in any environment. JBoss EAP’s architecture is modular, and cloud ready. The platform offers powerful management and automation for greater developer productivity. It is based on the open source Wildfly project (formerly known as JBoss Application Server).
Offer
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Learn more about JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Sample Customers
WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin TireAPD, Banco Azteca, Roche, Tata Sky, Frost Bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider14%
Insurance Company11%
Media Company6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: July 2020.
430,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.