Compare IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Microsoft System Center

IBM WebSphere Message Broker is ranked 12th in Application Infrastructure with 2 reviews while Microsoft System Center is ranked 7th in Application Infrastructure with 5 reviews. IBM WebSphere Message Broker is rated 8.0, while Microsoft System Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Message Broker writes "Mature, reliable, and performance-wise it is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft System Center writes "Easy to configure and provides Better visibility of our environment ". IBM WebSphere Message Broker is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, IBM DataPower Gateway, Mule ESB and IBM BPM, whereas Microsoft System Center is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite. See our IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Microsoft System Center report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Microsoft System Center and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
430,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Performance-wise, this solution is really good.It has many interfaces and you can connect to any backend source that has another format, and convert it to the desired format.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pros »

The deployment and asset management features are the most valuable. These are the product's main features.Good for managing and administering the infrastructure.Step-by-step documentation that clarifies the implementation procedure.The availability performance matrix and the reporting capabilities are the solution's most valuable features.The features that I have found most valuable are the ease of configuration and the easy discovery of the environment.

More Microsoft System Center Pros »

Cons
The images and size of the containers are too big and I think that they should be more lightweight.The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Cons »

We have some bugs but it's stable. It doesn't break every day. It works. Like other applications, it has a lot of bugs but they're manageable.Could be more user friendly.Implementation and integration in the case of multi-tenant environments needs improvement.The solution's dashboard needs improvement.They should have some customized solutions or internal development, then maybe it could be easier to use different solutions or some self-developed solution.

More Microsoft System Center Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
This product is more expensive than competing products.IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
430,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
2,865
Comparisons
2,458
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
499
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
506
Comparisons
269
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
486
Avg. Rating
8.2
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere Message Broker
Learn
IBM
Microsoft
Overview
WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.System Center helps customers realize the benefits of the Microsoft Cloud Platform by delivering unified management. Experience fast time-to-value with out-of-the-box monitoring, provisioning, configuration, automation, protection and self-service.
Offer
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Learn more about Microsoft System Center
Sample Customers
WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin TireKassen_rztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein, Magyar Telekom Nyrt., Adeka, QualCare, Aeriandi, UniCredit Bank d.d., Mostar, Allianz Australia Ltd., Grupo Familia
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider14%
Insurance Company11%
Media Company6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Microsoft System Center and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
430,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.