Compare IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Microsoft System Center

IBM WebSphere Message Broker is ranked 11th in Application Infrastructure with 2 reviews while Microsoft System Center is ranked 13th in Application Infrastructure with 4 reviews. IBM WebSphere Message Broker is rated 7.0, while Microsoft System Center is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Message Broker writes "Good performance, easy to use, and has support for many backend interfaces". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft System Center writes "Easy to configure and provides Better visibility of our environment ". IBM WebSphere Message Broker is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, IBM WebSphere DataPower and webMethods Integration Server, whereas Microsoft System Center is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, F5, Oracle and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: November 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The scalability of the solution is okay.It has many interfaces and you can connect to any backend source that has another format, and convert it to the desired format.

Read more »

The availability performance matrix and the reporting capabilities are the solution's most valuable features.The features that I have found most valuable are the ease of configuration and the easy discovery of the environment.System Center helps to create the basis for ITIL alignment.Many processes could be implemented out-of-the-box, and this helped to adopt processes in areas which we lacked.Managment Packs for Microsoft-specific products, help us implement the best practices for each product.The detail in the alarms is great.

Read more »

Cons
The solution overall could be simplified. Everything is too complex.The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is.

Read more »

The solution's dashboard needs improvement.They should have some customized solutions or internal development, then maybe it could be easier to use different solutions or some self-developed solution.The platform performance and responsiveness need improvement. It still demands high computing resources.Less server consumption would help, as would better, more flexible reports.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost.

Read more »

We maximized our license investment.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
2,720
Comparisons
2,476
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
496
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
577
Comparisons
248
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
442
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere Message Broker
Learn
IBM
Microsoft
Overview
WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.System Center helps customers realize the benefits of the Microsoft Cloud Platform by delivering unified management. Experience fast time-to-value with out-of-the-box monitoring, provisioning, configuration, automation, protection and self-service.
Offer
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Learn more about Microsoft System Center
Sample Customers
WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin TireKassen_rztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein, Magyar Telekom Nyrt., Adeka, QualCare, Aeriandi, UniCredit Bank d.d., Mostar, Allianz Australia Ltd., Grupo Familia
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, F5, Oracle and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: November 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email