Compare IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management

IBM WebSphere Message Broker is ranked 12th in Application Infrastructure with 2 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is ranked 19th in Application Infrastructure with 1 review. IBM WebSphere Message Broker is rated 8.0, while SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Message Broker writes "Mature, reliable, and performance-wise it is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management writes "Good stability and good visibility but requires a better user interface". IBM WebSphere Message Broker is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, IBM DataPower Gateway, Mule ESB and IBM BPM, whereas SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: July 2020.
430,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Performance-wise, this solution is really good.It has many interfaces and you can connect to any backend source that has another format, and convert it to the desired format.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pros »

There are many features of the solution that are quite useful. For us, the most valuable aspect may be visibility.

More SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management Pros »

Cons
The images and size of the containers are too big and I think that they should be more lightweight.The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Cons »

The solution could improve its user interface.

More SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
This product is more expensive than competing products.IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
430,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
2,865
Comparisons
2,458
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
499
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
81
Comparisons
59
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
411
Avg. Rating
6.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere Message BrokerNetWeaver Business Rules Management
Learn
IBM
SAP
Overview
WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management (SAP NetWeaver BRM) is part of the SAP NetWeaver AS Java. SAP NetWeaver BRM enables your organization to externalize business rules and manage them flexibly across multiple installations for greater agility, for consistent and transparent enforcement of policies across the entire enterprise.
Offer
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Learn more about SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management
Sample Customers
WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin TireDansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren, Lenovo
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider14%
Insurance Company11%
Media Company6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: July 2020.
430,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.