Compare IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Uniface

IBM WebSphere Message Broker is ranked 13th in Application Infrastructure while Uniface which is ranked 27th in Application Infrastructure. IBM WebSphere Message Broker is rated 0, while Uniface is rated 0. On the other hand, IBM WebSphere Message Broker is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, IBM WebSphere DataPower and webMethods Integration Server, whereas Uniface is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework and WebLogic Suite.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM WebSphere Message Broker Logo
6,385 views|2,738 comparisons
Uniface Logo
713 views|174 comparisons
Ranking
Views
6,385
Comparisons
2,738
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
713
Comparisons
174
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, F5, Oracle and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: August 2019.
360,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 80% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Also Known As
WebSphere Message BrokerCompuware Uniface
Learn
IBM
Uniface
Overview
WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.

Uniface’s model-driven, low-code methodology empowers developers to focus on high-value tasks like user experience and business logic integration, rather than basic coding. The result? New applications make it to market or into internal use faster and with less work than ever, removing barriers to innovation, creating fresh revenue streams and thrilling end users.

Offer
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Learn more about Uniface
Sample Customers
WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin TireBMW, Boeing, Ford, Telmex, NTT Data, Kawasaki, Takt, FCS, MidlandHR, Dixons Carphone, DHL, Land Rover, 7Eleven
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, F5, Oracle and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: August 2019.
360,012 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email