• Home
  • IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Uniface

IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs Uniface comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo

IBM WebSphere Message Broker

Read 11 IBM WebSphere Message Broker reviews
586 views|505 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Uniface Logo

Uniface

184 views|143 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere Message Broker and Uniface based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ajit Pillai
Helps our organization integrate disparate systems, but it is a weighty product
The solution has improved our organization by centralizing all our integrations.
Use Uniface?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost."
  • "The price is very high and it's the main reason that we are searching for alternatives."
  • "This product is more expensive than competing products."
  • "I feel with IBM, when you want certain functions or features, you have to continuously purchase add-ons. There are always additional fees."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "The solution is expensive."

    • More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about IBM WebSphere Message Broker?
    Top Answer:It is a scalable solution...The setup is easy.
    Read all 12 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM WebSphere Mes...
    Top Answer:The solution is expensive. I give the cost a one out of ten. We pay for an annual license.
    Read all 8 answers   →
    What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Message Broker?
    Top Answer:Stability and pricing are areas with shortcomings that need improvement.
    Read all 11 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    10th
    out of 36 in Application Infrastructure
    Views
    586
    Comparisons
    505
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    384
    Rating
    8.4
    24th
    out of 36 in Application Infrastructure
    Views
    184
    Comparisons
    143
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WebSphere Message Broker
    Compuware Uniface
    Learn More
    IBM
    Uniface
    Overview
    WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.

    Uniface’s model-driven, low-code methodology empowers developers to focus on high-value tasks like user experience and business logic integration, rather than basic coding. The result? New applications make it to market or into internal use faster and with less work than ever, removing barriers to innovation, creating fresh revenue streams and thrilling end users.

    Sample Customers
    WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin Tire
    BMW, Boeing, Ford, Telmex, NTT Data, Kawasaki, Takt, FCS, MidlandHR, Dixons Carphone, DHL, Land Rover, 7Eleven
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company9%
    Retailer6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business18%
    Large Enterprise82%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise74%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Infrastructure
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM WebSphere Message Broker is ranked 10th in Application Infrastructure with 11 reviews while Uniface is ranked 24th in Application Infrastructure. IBM WebSphere Message Broker is rated 7.8, while Uniface is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Message Broker writes "For new applications that are being onboarded, we engage this tool so the data can flow as required but there's some lag in the GUI". On the other hand, IBM WebSphere Message Broker is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Mule ESB, IBM DataPower Gateway and IBM BPM, whereas Uniface is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework.

    See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

    We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.