Compare IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Windows Server AppFabric

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Windows Server AppFabric? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: July 2020.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
The price is very high and it's the main reason that we are searching for alternatives.This product is more expensive than competing products.IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
2,865
Comparisons
2,458
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
499
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
161
Comparisons
124
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
WebSphere Message Broker
Learn
IBM
Microsoft
Overview
WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.Windows Server AppFabric extends Windows Server to provide enhanced hosting, management, and caching capabilities for Web applications and middle-tier services. The AppFabric hosting features add service management extensions to Internet Information Services (IIS), Windows Process Activation Service (WAS), and the .NET Framework 4. This includes Hosting Services and Hosting Administration tools that make it easier to deploy, configure, and manage Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and Windows Workflow Foundation (WF) based services. The AppFabric caching features add a distributed, in-memory object cache to Windows Server that makes it easier to scale out high-performance .NET applications, especially ASP.NET applications.
Offer
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Learn more about Windows Server AppFabric
Sample Customers
WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin TireOSIsoft
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider14%
Insurance Company11%
Media Company6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: July 2020.
431,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM WebSphere Message Broker is ranked 12th in Application Infrastructure with 3 reviews while Windows Server AppFabric is ranked 27th in Application Infrastructure. IBM WebSphere Message Broker is rated 7.6, while Windows Server AppFabric is rated 0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Message Broker writes "Mature, reliable, and performance-wise it is good". On the other hand, IBM WebSphere Message Broker is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, IBM DataPower Gateway, Mule ESB and IBM BPM, whereas Windows Server AppFabric is most compared with IIS.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.