We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere Message Broker and Zulu Embedded based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.Earn 20 points
IBM WebSphere Message Broker is ranked 10th in Application Infrastructure with 11 reviews while Zulu Embedded is ranked 21st in Application Infrastructure. IBM WebSphere Message Broker is rated 7.8, while Zulu Embedded is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Message Broker writes "For new applications that are being onboarded, we engage this tool so the data can flow as required but there's some lag in the GUI". On the other hand, IBM WebSphere Message Broker is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Mule ESB, IBM DataPower Gateway and IBM BPM, whereas Zulu Embedded is most compared with Azul Zulu, Azul Zing and Apache Web Server.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.