Compare IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Zulu Embedded

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Zulu Embedded? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: July 2020.
431,670 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
The price is very high and it's the main reason that we are searching for alternatives.This product is more expensive than competing products.IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
431,670 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
2,865
Comparisons
2,458
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
499
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
274
Comparisons
237
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 73% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Also Known As
WebSphere Message Broker
Learn
IBM
Azul Systems
Overview
WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.

Open Source Java for IoT & Embedded Systems.

Tired of high Java licensing costs, restrictive terms of use and proprietary vendor lock-in?

Azul is the world's largest commercial vendor delivering multi-platform, 100% open source OpenJDK builds targeting the embedded, IoT, and maker communities.

Offer
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Learn more about Zulu Embedded
Sample Customers
WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin TireV2COMM
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider14%
Insurance Company11%
Media Company6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: July 2020.
431,670 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM WebSphere Message Broker is ranked 12th in Application Infrastructure with 3 reviews while Zulu Embedded is ranked 24th in Application Infrastructure. IBM WebSphere Message Broker is rated 7.6, while Zulu Embedded is rated 0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Message Broker writes "Mature, reliable, and performance-wise it is good". On the other hand, IBM WebSphere Message Broker is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, IBM DataPower Gateway, Mule ESB and IBM BPM, whereas Zulu Embedded is most compared with Azul Zulu and Azul Zing.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.