IBM WebSphere sMash [EOL] vs Windows Process Activation Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere sMash [EOL] and Windows Process Activation Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use IBM WebSphere sMash [EOL]?
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Infrastructure
Views
234
Comparisons
183
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere sMash
Learn More
IBM
Video Not Available
Overview
Information Not Available
Windows Process Activation Service generalizes the Internet Information Services (IIS) process model, removing the dependency on HTTP. All the features of IIS that were previously available only to HTTP applications are now available to applications hosting Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) services, by using non-HTTP protocols. IIS 7.0 also uses Windows Process Activation Service for message-based activation over HTTP.
Sample Customers
Jaguar Land Rover
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Harris Farm Markets, The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA), Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council, John Keells Holdings, Green Prefab, 343 Industries, SM Prime, Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System Ltd.
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM WebSphere sMash [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure while Windows Process Activation Services is ranked 23rd in Application Infrastructure. IBM WebSphere sMash [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Windows Process Activation Services is rated 4.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Process Activation Services writes "Central console enables us to see all of the activated and deactivated computers but it has poor alerts and frustrating technical support". IBM WebSphere sMash [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Windows Process Activation Services is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework and IIS.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.