IBM WebSphere Studio Developer vs Zend Studio comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere Studio Developer and Zend Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Adobe, FourJs and others in .NET Development Services.
To learn more, read our detailed .NET Development Services Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The product requires a subscription to Zend Server Developer, which used to be free and now has an annual fee, but it is still worth the money."
  • "Licensing is reasonable for this type of tool. Although, you can cobble together a solution which is zero cost."
  • More Zend Studio Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Views
    120
    Comparisons
    37
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    154
    Comparisons
    57
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    .NET Development Services
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Adobe, FourJs and others in .NET Development Services. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WebSphere Studio Developer
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM WebSphere Studio Application Developer is an easy-to-use, integrated development environment for building, testing, and deploying Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE platform) applications. It is designed for professional developers requiring integrated Web, JSP, XML and Web services support.
    Zend Studio – the PHP IDE for smarter development. It codes faster with up to 3X performance improvements in indexing, validation, searching of PHP code. It has superior PHP 7.1 support, PHP 7.1 express migration assistant, and seamless integration with Zend Server 9. It provides robust debugging capabilities with Xdebug, Zend Debugger, and Z-Ray integration. Zend Studio has an extensive plugin capabilities provided by the large Eclipse eco-system and supports for best-in-class dev tools including Docker and Git Flow Intelligent code editor. Deploy PHP applications on any server including cloud support for Amazon AWS and Microsoft Azure and support for HiDPi displays - scale graphics (ala 4K resolution).
    Sample Customers
    Alpha Modus, Apptimate AB, Senet Inc., Australian Government Department of Defence, Factor-y S.r.l., Foedus, Elemental Path, CinePostproduction, UniCredit, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp., Lodha Group
    CDS Global, EnglishCentral, BNP Paribas, Carlo Gavazzi, Sunstate Equipment, Novadex GmbH, CONFTEC, Marilan, Mediaspike, Cisco WebEx, Corvette America, Value Drug Mart Associates Ltd., Allied Beverage Group
    Buyer's Guide
    .NET Development Services
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Adobe, FourJs and others in .NET Development Services. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM WebSphere Studio Developer is ranked 9th in .NET Development Services while Zend Studio is ranked 8th in .NET Development Services. IBM WebSphere Studio Developer is rated 0.0, while Zend Studio is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zend Studio writes "It has higher quality code, faster debugging, and higher quality projects". IBM WebSphere Studio Developer is most compared with , whereas Zend Studio is most compared with .

    See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.

    We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.