IBM XIV vs NEC D3 series comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
198 views|138 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
NEC Logo
72 views|36 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM XIV and NEC D3 series based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network).
To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Hands down, this is the easiest storage platform on the market to manage.""Installation is amazingly easy.""The performance and robustness of the systems are very good.""Very easy to produce reporting data (Snaps). Very easy and fast for provisioning devices and Remote mirroring.""As it spreads, a chuck of 1MB across the board means using all available spindles on the backend.""IBM XIV's most valuable features are NVME, especially when it comes to de-duplication, compression, and responsiveness."

More IBM XIV Pros →

"The performance is better than with our previous version."

More NEC D3 series Pros →

Cons
"I would rather have a web GUI served directly from the unit, and a CLI accessible directly through SSH.""The change form synchronous mirroring to asynchronous (and vice versa) without reconfiguration from scratch would be helpful.""Until the drive is replaced, the pool_resizing is locked.""I encountered stability (performance) issues during enclosure or disk rebuild. Also some power supply issues due to malfunctions of ​circuits. Sometimes "internal" Snap sessions hang and consume pool capacity.""IBM XIV's scalability is adequate for our requirements, but because it's modular, you can't scale to larger requirements.""This product was not a good fit for our organization as we have a ton of latency sensitive applications and XIV was not able to keep up with IO + latency demand."

More IBM XIV Cons →

"We are not satisfied with the cost of licensing and would like to have a better price to performance ratio."

More NEC D3 series Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "If you are going to use the product behind an SVC, IBM will price the units lower, since you are likely not to use any of the advanced copy services."
  • "No-license-required policy, unlike others where you need a license for everything. Just pay once and forget about licenses."
  • "Licensing is straightforward."
  • "We have a five-year total cost of ownership where we pay an initial amount and then annually for maintenance."
  • More IBM XIV Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:IBM XIV's most valuable features are NVME, especially when it comes to de-duplication, compression, and responsiveness.
    Top Answer:We have a five-year total cost of ownership where we pay an initial amount and then annually for maintenance.
    Top Answer:IBM XIV is attractive because it gives value for money in terms of features. I would give IBM XIV a rating of seven out of ten.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    198
    Comparisons
    138
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    201
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    72
    Comparisons
    36
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    XIV
    D3 series
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM XIV is a high-end, grid-scale storage system that excels in tuning-free consistent performance, ease of use and exceptional data economics, including inline, and IBM Real-time Compression. IBM XIV is ideal for hybrid cloud, offering predictable service levels for dynamic workloads, simplified scale management, including in multi-tenant environments, flexible consumption models — and robust cloud automation and orchestration through OpenStack, RESTful API and VMware. It offers security and data protection through hot encryption, advanced mirroring and self-healing and investment protection with perpetual licensing.

    D3-10 is Low end disk array device with up to 144 HDD modules.
    Sample Customers
    Celero, NaviSite, Technische Universit_t Mªnchen, Netflix Inc., Muhr und Bender KG, Pelephone Communications
    Tsukuba Science City, Hokkaido Telecommunication Network Co. Inc, PHP Institute
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM XIV is ranked 10th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) with 6 reviews while NEC D3 series is ranked 21st in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). IBM XIV is rated 7.6, while NEC D3 series is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM XIV writes "Using it behind the SAN volume controller, latency is predictable and it is reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NEC D3 series writes "Stable, performs well, and the technical support is good". IBM XIV is most compared with IBM FlashSystem, whereas NEC D3 series is most compared with .

    See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

    We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.