Compare IBM XIV vs. Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM XIV Logo
502 views|340 comparisons
Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance Logo
1,255 views|1,027 comparisons
Ranking
11th
out of 23 in Modular SAN
Views
502
Comparisons
340
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
9th
out of 23 in Modular SAN
Views
1,255
Comparisons
1,027
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, NetApp and others in Modular SAN. Updated: April 2021.
475,705 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
XIV
Sun ZFS Storage Appliance
Learn More
Overview

IBM XIV is a high-end, grid-scale storage system that excels in tuning-free consistent performance, ease of use and exceptional data economics, including inline, and IBM Real-time Compression. IBM XIV is ideal for hybrid cloud, offering predictable service levels for dynamic workloads, simplified scale management, including in multi-tenant environments, flexible consumption models — and robust cloud automation and orchestration through OpenStack, RESTful API and VMware. It offers security and data protection through hot encryption, advanced mirroring and self-healing and investment protection with perpetual licensing.

Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance integrates the cloud into its core architecture, making cloud storage available to all users and access protocols while eliminating on-premises cloud access licensing charges and the need for external gateways. Built using a powerful SMP design, multi-threaded OS, massive DRAM caches, and all flash storage, Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance powers the most demanding applications, from fast query responses and, rapid transaction processing to virtualization and cloud workloads. With these performance levels, you can easily achieve 4:1 consolidation of your current NAS filers and gain a higher return on your storage investment.

Offer
Learn more about IBM XIV
Learn more about Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance
Sample Customers
Celero, NaviSite, Technische Universit_t Mªnchen, Netflix Inc., Muhr und Bender KG, Pelephone Communications
Translational Genomics Research Institute, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, CyberSolutions Inc., Y-Telecom, First Alliance Bank Zambia Limited, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende, Mutlinet Pakistan, TDC A/S, Digi-Key Corporation, Thurgau Cantonal Bank
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider20%
Manufacturing Company6%
Government5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, NetApp and others in Modular SAN. Updated: April 2021.
475,705 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM XIV is ranked 11th in Modular SAN while Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is ranked 9th in Modular SAN. IBM XIV is rated 0.0, while Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM XIV is most compared with IBM FlashSystem, NetApp FAS Series and HPE 3PAR StoreServ, whereas Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is most compared with NetApp FAS Series, HPE 3PAR StoreServ, Nutanix Acropolis AOS, IBM FlashSystem and HPE StorageWorks MSA.

See our list of best Modular SAN vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.