CyberArk Identity vs Imprivata OneSign comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CyberArk Logo
959 views|789 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Imprivata Logo
1,072 views|632 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and Imprivata OneSign based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).
To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial setup of CyberArk Identity was straightforward.""I found the solution to be stable.""I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users.""CyberArk Identity is a mature product.""The setup, via cloud, is simple.""The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half.""The most valuable feature of CyberArk Identity is the adaptive interface.""The most valuable features of CyberArk Identity are its ability to control access to administrative staff."

More CyberArk Identity Pros →

"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack.""It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."

More Imprivata OneSign Pros →

Cons
"CyberArk Identity's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement.""CyberArk Identity could improve by having the ability to better manage the network, such as Cisco. There seem to be some issues in this area.""More integrations would be better.""The product needs to leverage the cloud more, especially in the financial sector, where cloud adoption might be limited. Proper reporting within the cloud is essential. The tool should be more user-friendly to expedite access for users. The current agent-based system poses challenges if a user loses access to the server, making tasks difficult to perform. It should also improve technical support.""We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices.""In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement.""The OpenID features could improve in CyberArk Identity.""They could improve their UI and make everything more user-friendly."

More CyberArk Identity Cons →

"They should have a landing page.""I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."

More Imprivata OneSign Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."
  • "There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."
  • "I would rate the tool’s pricing a seven out of ten. The product’s pricing is expensive and is on a yearly basis. You will need to pay around 10,000 GBP for 500 users."
  • "The pricing of CyberArk Identity is competitive."
  • "There could be some additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution when you want to develop connectors in CyberArk Identity."
  • "In terms of pricing, BeyondTrust and CyberArk tend to be more expensive, with CyberArk receiving an eight out of ten, in this regard."
  • "CyberArk Identity is an expensive solution."
  • "It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive."
  • More CyberArk Identity Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price is reasonable, it's an affordable solution."
  • "At the moment, I believe the price is reasonable."
  • More Imprivata OneSign Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.
    Top Answer:Their pricing is obviously a lot higher than many vendors in the marketplace but their service is also unmatched.
    Top Answer:In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for… more »
    Top Answer:It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution.
    Top Answer:They provide a license key. I am not able to disclose the pricing information. At the moment, I believe the price is reasonable.
    Ranking
    9th
    Views
    959
    Comparisons
    789
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    462
    Rating
    7.8
    12th
    Views
    1,072
    Comparisons
    632
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    364
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Idaptive
    OneSign, Imprivata OneSign Authentication Management
    Learn More
    Overview

    CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

    CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

    • Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
    • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
    • Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
    • Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

    According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

    IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

    Imprivata OneSign delivers fast, secure no-click-access to the applications and information that care providers need, whenever and wherever they need it.

    Security and regulatory compliance requirements mandate user authentication technology for accessing workstations and applications. As a result, care providers need to enter unique usernames and passwords (or PINs) for order signing, documentation signing, medication reconciliation and most other applications throughout their workflow. These laborious login requirements can disrupt clinical focus and obstruct patient care.

    Sample Customers
    MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido
    AZ Groeninge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust, Mahaska Health Partnership, Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Boulder Community Hospital, City of Marietta, Spencer Hospital, Southwest Washington Medical Center, South Shore Hospital
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Computer Software Company30%
    Insurance Company10%
    Consumer Goods Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Insurance Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization40%
    Healthcare Company21%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise48%
    Large Enterprise34%
    Buyer's Guide
    Single Sign-On (SSO)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CyberArk Identity is ranked 9th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 17 reviews while Imprivata OneSign is ranked 12th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews. CyberArk Identity is rated 8.2, while Imprivata OneSign is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "Allows Linux and Unix administrators to login with single password ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imprivata OneSign writes "Reasonably priced, performs well, easy to deploy, and has responsive technical support". CyberArk Identity is most compared with Microsoft Intune, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ and PingFederate, whereas Imprivata OneSign is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Evidian Enterprise SSO, Okta Workforce Identity, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Auth0.

    See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

    We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.