CyberArk Identity vs Safe-T Secure Application Access comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CyberArk Logo
814 views|674 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Safe-T Logo
72 views|55 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Access Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users.""It has machine learning and can help clients to learn the environment and understand what is happening.""The most valuable feature of CyberArk Identity is the adaptive interface.""The initial setup of CyberArk Identity was straightforward.""The tool helps with authentication. It acts as an MFA for any kind of privileged access that occurs in our organization.""The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security.""The setup, via cloud, is simple.""The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients."

More CyberArk Identity Pros →

"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure.""Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook.""If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible""It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."

More Safe-T Secure Application Access Pros →

Cons
"CyberArk Identity could improve by having the ability to better manage the network, such as Cisco. There seem to be some issues in this area.""In terms of a governance platform, it's worth noting that CyberArk doesn't offer a particularly strong one.""The product needs to leverage the cloud more, especially in the financial sector, where cloud adoption might be limited. Proper reporting within the cloud is essential. The tool should be more user-friendly to expedite access for users. The current agent-based system poses challenges if a user loses access to the server, making tasks difficult to perform. It should also improve technical support.""The OpenID features could improve in CyberArk Identity.""The user interface could be improved.""More integrations would be better.""We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices.""The solution's difficulty in gaining skill sets should be improved because it's a vertical product."

More CyberArk Identity Cons →

"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office.""One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."

More Safe-T Secure Application Access Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."
  • "There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."
  • "I would rate the tool’s pricing a seven out of ten. The product’s pricing is expensive and is on a yearly basis. You will need to pay around 10,000 GBP for 500 users."
  • "The pricing of CyberArk Identity is competitive."
  • "There could be some additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution when you want to develop connectors in CyberArk Identity."
  • "In terms of pricing, BeyondTrust and CyberArk tend to be more expensive, with CyberArk receiving an eight out of ten, in this regard."
  • "CyberArk Identity is an expensive solution."
  • "It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive."
  • More CyberArk Identity Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.
    Top Answer:Their pricing is obviously a lot higher than many vendors in the marketplace but their service is also unmatched.
    Top Answer:In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    8th
    out of 37 in Access Management
    Views
    814
    Comparisons
    674
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    462
    Rating
    7.8
    27th
    out of 37 in Access Management
    Views
    72
    Comparisons
    55
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Idaptive
    Safe-T SDA, Safe-T, Safe-T Software-Defined Access
    Learn More
    Overview

    CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

    CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

    • Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
    • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
    • Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
    • Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

    According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

    IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.



    Safe-T is a provider of Zero Trust Access solutions which mitigate attacks on enterprises’ business-critical services and sensitive data, while ensuring uninterrupted business continuity. 

    Safe-T’s cloud and on-premises solutions ensure that an organization’s access use cases, whether into the organization or from the organization out to the internet, are secured according to the “validate first, access later” philosophy of Zero Trust. 

    This means that no one is trusted by default from inside or outside the network, and verification is required from everyone trying to gain access to resources on the network or in the cloud. 

    Safe-T’s wide range of access solutions reduce organizations’ attack surface and improve their ability to defend against modern cyberthreats. As an additional layer of security, our integrated business-grade global proxy solution cloud service enables smooth and efficient traffic flow, interruption-free service, unlimited concurrent connections, instant scaling and simple integration with our services. 

    With Safe-T’s patented reverse-access technology and proprietary routing technology, organizations of all size and type can secure their data, services and networks against internal and external threats. 

    At Safe-T, we empower enterprises to safely migrate to the cloud and enable digital transformation.

    Sample Customers
    MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido
    Government of Israel, eviCore Healthcore, Glen Imaging, Sarin, LBG, Rollomatic, Boegli-Gravures SA, Banque Heritage, Groupe Minoteries, Temenos, ZEK, RLM Finsbury, Harel Insurance, Meitav Dash
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Computer Software Company30%
    Insurance Company10%
    Consumer Goods Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Insurance Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise65%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Access Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CyberArk Identity is ranked 8th in Access Management with 17 reviews while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 27th in Access Management. CyberArk Identity is rated 8.2, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "Allows Linux and Unix administrators to login with single password ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". CyberArk Identity is most compared with Microsoft Intune, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ and PingFederate, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with .

    See our list of best Access Management vendors.

    We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.