IDERA SQL Secure vs Informatica Persistent Data Masking comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IDERA Logo
130 views|84 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Informatica Logo
303 views|179 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IDERA SQL Secure and Informatica Persistent Data Masking based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Imperva, Oracle and others in Database Security.
To learn more, read our detailed Database Security Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Security solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:Informatica Persistent Data Masking can mask production data for different users, ensuring that only authorized individuals can access sensitive information.
Top Answer:I think there's only one area that could be improved. Currently, when we apply the Data Masking rate, we don't have a way to view the masked data. It would be helpful if there was a feature to allow… more »
Top Answer:Test data management is a common use case. When conducting testing in lower environments, we want to avoid exposing sensitive information. To achieve this, we use Data Masking to modify the data. For… more »
Ranking
15th
out of 22 in Database Security
Views
130
Comparisons
84
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
6th
out of 31 in Data Masking
Views
303
Comparisons
179
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
544
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
SQL Secure
Data Masking, Informatica Data Masking
Learn More
Overview

SQL Secure helps database administrators to manage SQL Server security in physical, virtual, and cloud environments - including managed cloud databases. Unlike its competition, it provides configurable data collection, customizable templates to satisfy audits for multiple regulatory guidelines, extensive security checks and audit rules, automated server registration process, and server group tagging.

De-identify, de-sensitize, and anonymize sensitive data from unauthorized access for application users, business intelligence, application testing, and outsourcing.

Sample Customers
Charles Schwab; Old National Bank; Sharp; Premera; HomeServer USA; Target Australia Pyt Ltd.; Skygen USA; South African National Blood Service
Vale, Hot Telecommunication, UPMC
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm23%
Computer Software Company13%
Government7%
Insurance Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise70%
Buyer's Guide
Database Security
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Imperva, Oracle and others in Database Security. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IDERA SQL Secure is ranked 15th in Database Security while Informatica Persistent Data Masking is ranked 6th in Data Masking with 5 reviews. IDERA SQL Secure is rated 8.0, while Informatica Persistent Data Masking is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IDERA SQL Secure writes "It provides printable reports and security configuration advice". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Persistent Data Masking writes "Enables secure data protection during testing and controlled access to sensitive information". IDERA SQL Secure is most compared with , whereas Informatica Persistent Data Masking is most compared with Delphix, Protegrity Data Security, IBM Security Guardium Data Protection, IBM InfoSphere Optim and Imperva SecureSphere Database Security.

We monitor all Database Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.