Compare IFS Applications vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use JD Edwards EnterpriseOne? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IFS Applications vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The main reason for the ERP project was to bring together our fourteen sites, which had until then worked in separate silos.""The product is quite flexible.""The solution overall is very versatile and flexible, especially compared to other products.""Some of the strengths are Enterprise Management Solutions and the series of Management solutions which is number one in Gartner's report and has been for the last five years."

More IFS Applications Pros »

"The solution is very customizable according to business needs.""The most valuable feature is the user experience, where you can create your own queries, it sends you alerts, and it's very flexible.""The interface is very user-friendly."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Pros »

Cons
"The CRM was shaky and although this improves in Apps 10, there is room for improvement.""The user interface can be improved. When you're clicking through the screens, there are some icons or symbols that really need updating and would be more useful and noticeable if they are aesthetically pleasing.""It would be ideal if, in the future, the product could incorporate IoT and blockchain elements. We'd like to explore more of these types of features going forward.""There are certain digital features that need to be incorporated, such as IOP."

More IFS Applications Cons »

"Financial side could be expanded by bringing in things like the IMS.""I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries.""We originally used EnterpriseOne for preventative maintenance, but it is not very good at that so we migrated to Maximo for that task."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Pricing is an area that could be improved. They could be more competitive."

More IFS Applications Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The licensing is for mid-market businesses, where it is cheaper than Oracle Cloud, EBS, or SAP."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
7th
out of 54 in ERP
Views
5,384
Comparisons
3,728
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
649
Rating
8.0
5th
out of 54 in ERP
Views
9,186
Comparisons
7,495
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
978
Rating
10.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 55% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Learn
IFS
Video Not Available
Oracle
Overview

IFS develops and delivers enterprise software for customers around the world who manufacture and distribute goods, maintain assets, and manage service-focused operations. The industry expertise of our people and solutions, together with commitment to our customers, has made us a recognized leader and the most recommended supplier in our sector. Our team of 3,500 employees supports more than 10,000 customers worldwide from a network of local offices and through our growing ecosystem of partners. For more information, visit: IFSworld.com

Oracle's JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is an integrated applications suite of comprehensive enterprise resource planning software that combines business value, standards-based technology, and deep industry experience into a business solution with a low total cost of ownership. EnterpriseOne is the first ERP solution to run all applications on Apple iPad. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne also delivers mobile applications.
Offer
Learn more about IFS Applications
Learn more about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Sample Customers
Saab Aerospace, Teledyne Technologies, Gables Engineering, Chief Industries, Linamar, Valmont, Hecla Mining, CDF Corporation, Shawcor Ltd, Richardson International, Rowan CompaniesTechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider22%
Manufacturing Company7%
Financial Services Firm5%
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company24%
Construction Company18%
Retailer12%
Manufacturing Company12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company5%
Manufacturing Company4%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise44%
Find out what your peers are saying about IFS Applications vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IFS Applications is ranked 7th in ERP with 4 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 5th in ERP with 3 reviews. IFS Applications is rated 8.0, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of IFS Applications writes "Realized benefits in reporting and overall communication after consolidating our sites". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "User-friendly, flexible and easy to customize, and offers good support for different industries". IFS Applications is most compared with SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite, IBM Maximo, Microsoft Dynamics NAV and Infor M3, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite, Oracle ERP Cloud and SAP S4HANA. See our IFS Applications vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.

See our list of best ERP vendors and best Activity Based Costing Software vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.