Compare IFS Applications vs. Oracle Enterprise Asset Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Oracle Enterprise Asset Management? Share your opinion.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Pricing is an area that could be improved. They could be more competitive."

More IFS Applications Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
5,384
Comparisons
3,728
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
649
Rating
8.0
Views
1,101
Comparisons
982
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 55% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Learn
IFS
Video Not Available
Oracle
Overview

IFS develops and delivers enterprise software for customers around the world who manufacture and distribute goods, maintain assets, and manage service-focused operations. The industry expertise of our people and solutions, together with commitment to our customers, has made us a recognized leader and the most recommended supplier in our sector. Our team of 3,500 employees supports more than 10,000 customers worldwide from a network of local offices and through our growing ecosystem of partners. For more information, visit: IFSworld.com

Oracle Enterprise Asset Management provides comprehensive planning, tracking and execution to support optimal asset monitoring and performance. Its condition-based maintenance strategies for plants, property and public infrastructure along with an integrated asset repository ensures best practices and quality compliance globally.

Oracle Enterprise Asset Management (eAM) eliminates excess and obsolete spare parts inventories, promotes environmental, health and safety policies, and improves coordination of production and maintenance schedules.

Offer
Learn more about IFS Applications
Learn more about Oracle Enterprise Asset Management
Sample Customers
Saab Aerospace, Teledyne Technologies, Gables Engineering, Chief Industries, Linamar, Valmont, Hecla Mining, CDF Corporation, Shawcor Ltd, Richardson International, Rowan Companiesaverda, Eaton Corp., Hover Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., Kalpataru Ltd, SITA, United Automotive Electronic Systems Co. Ltd., Yarra Valley Water, KEC International Ltd., eVerge Group, Cerner Corp., Standard Life, Company RS a.d. Banja Luka (Telekomunikacije RS a.d., Banja Luka Telecommunications
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider22%
Manufacturing Company6%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider20%
Media Company10%
Government8%
Find out what your peers are saying about IFS Applications vs. Oracle Enterprise Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IFS Applications is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management with 4 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Asset Management. IFS Applications is rated 8.0, while Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IFS Applications writes "Realized benefits in reporting and overall communication after consolidating our sites". On the other hand, IFS Applications is most compared with SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite, IBM Maximo, Microsoft Dynamics NAV and QAD Cloud ERP, whereas Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is most compared with IBM Maximo, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM, Infor CloudSuite EAM, ServiceNow and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management.

See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.