TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Provides a valuable BPMN feature.""Another good feature is that the numbering of the shapes in iGrafx is much easier and more convenient, in comparison to what is found in Visio. So far I haven't found anything similar to what I have with iGrafx, in that regard.""The solution's technical support is of good quality since they offer fast and seamless services.""This product fulfills ninety percent of our needs, and we're happy as users of it.""The solution is very stable.""Finding the right symbol and creating links, horizontal and vertical are the features I use.""Simulation is most valuable.""We found the technical support to be helpful."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Pros →

"For specific situations this can be a good solution and a simplified interface to work with.""The scheduling and the calendar are very useful.""It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is very low. I have worked on a lot of service projects, and the engine is very stable, robust, and scalable. The development and change requests can be pushed quickly, and the mapper activity and SSLT kind of features are also good. It is easy to do changes, testing, and deployment. Its deployment is very easy, and we can automate a lot of scripts for our on-premises solution. I work for an investment bank, and we have automated a lot of processes for our customers. Previously, we used to develop scripts and tools. With version 6.x, everything is moved to Maven and other things. Environment handling is done mostly through DevOps tools. As compared to Mulesoft, the deployment and configuration are very easy in TIBCO.""The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.""The capacity for distributing the jobs in a workflow is an important feature."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Pros →

Cons
"It would be nice to have a Spanish user interface available to us.""In the next release, I would like to see more layers like three, four, and five. It might be possible but I haven't seen it yet.""With iGrafx, the implementation and the licensing were pretty complex.""I would love to see a template and shapes for customer journey mapping.""It would be helpful to be able to do more analytics and generate reports on historical documents that have already been uploaded to the server.""The look and feel, along with the ease of use of the solution's web modeling version, is an area with certain shortcomings.""It can be more user-friendly.""The price could be more competitive."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Cons →

"Technical support needs to be streamlined.""ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is there are on the higher side with very low coding. TIBCO stays in the middle like IBM or Oracle. TIBCO can move towards IBM's way of doing. IBM has a big market and many varieties of products and good integration, which TIBCO doesn't have. It can have better integration. TIBCO's transition to the cloud is a little slow. As compared to Dell, Boomi, and Mulesoft. TIBCO took the steps a little later. TIBCO's ID was far better and easier to work with previously. TIBCO's 5.x ID was very good, and the development environment and the transition were easy. Version 6.5 onwards, it is a stable product, but it would be good if they can do something similar to version 5.4 with version 6. They should concentrate on this API market. It will give them the strength and the ability to grab the market back.""The product is missing some means of addressing more complex BPM constructs and should interface with more platforms easily.""The maintenance of the package could be improved.""The scalability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "My company is trying to replace iGrafx because the license is a little bit expensive."
  • "Our license is a subscription-based model that is per user. The solution is not expensive, I believe a subscription-based model is $10 per user."
  • "The licensing part is one of the problems. Its licensing depends on the number of users, so it sometimes gets expensive."
  • More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There are some discussions about perpetual licenses and conversions, but I'm not much familiar with them."
  • "TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is an expensive tool compared to others."
  • More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's technical support is of good quality since they offer fast and seamless services.
    Top Answer:I’m not sure of the exact pricing. However, I would describe their costs as mid-tier.
    Top Answer:The look and feel, along with the ease of use of the solution's web modeling version, is an area with certain shortcomings. The web modeling part can be a bit complex or difficult for new users of the… more »
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.
    Top Answer:The product fails to offer good integration with REST, making it an area where improvements are required. The scalability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The… more »
    Top Answer:I use the solution in my company for case management and business process management. In general, there are two kinds of use cases attached to the product. For case management, you need to have… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,033
    Comparisons
    630
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    478
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    776
    Comparisons
    579
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    622
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    The iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is a comprehensive software platform tailored for organizations undergoing digital transformation. Its core functionalities include process mining, process design, simulation, predictive analytics, and AI-based automation. By leveraging these tools, businesses can gain valuable insights into their processes, streamline design and optimization efforts, and harness automation for enhanced efficiency. Whether analyzing existing processes, visually modeling workflows, simulating potential changes, or employing predictive analytics, Process360 Live facilitates a seamless journey towards process intelligence and management, pivotal for modern businesses aiming for operational excellence.

    TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is used to develop, deploy, execute and manage Business Process Management centric applications. Use TIBCO Business Studio BPM Edition in conjunction with ActiveMatrix BPM to model business processes. It helps to encompass applications that primarily automate both: business processes (sequences of tasks) to be executed by human users, and technical processes (the flow of data) to be executed by enterprise applications.
    Sample Customers
    Multinational Bank
    ADIS, Citi, Bank of Montreal, First Citizens Bank
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Consumer Goods Company30%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Engineering Company10%
    Pharma/Biotech Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Government7%
    Transportation Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm37%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is ranked 21st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 15 reviews while TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is ranked 30th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is rated 8.4, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform writes " A reasonably stable BPM solution useful for process governance and process mining". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM writes "A tool backed by stellar support that has helped me plan workflows easily". iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is most compared with Visio, ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager, Camunda and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, whereas TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is most compared with Camunda, Pega BPM, TIBCO iProcess Suite, Appian and IBM BPM. See our TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.