We performed a comparison between IIS and JBoss based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."IIS's most valuable feature is user-friendliness."
"IIS is useful for the deployment of web applications...Its stability is good."
"IIS is stable."
"The product is scalable."
"The solution has been reliable."
"The product is easy to use."
"This is definitely a stable solution."
"IIS's best features are its management console and stability."
"The stability is great."
"The greatest benefit of JBoss is that it was procured by IBM, thereby offering exceptional support for our banking operations."
"We can deploy the applications on the JBoss server, so it is easy to manage. It's also easy to add new certificates to the config."
"The most valuable thing about JBoss is how easy it is to install and manage it on-premise, making the process simple."
"It is a Java-based product, so it is pretty straightforward. It is pretty easy from a developer's perspective. It is also pretty reliable and scalable."
"We use JBoss mainly for application deployments and application servers."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The most valuable feature is the UI."
"Sometimes, we encounter difficult issues, and getting support from Microsoft to resolve those issues is not easy."
"If Microsoft IIS could work well with AppOptics or things like PHP, Python, and other custom languages that run on the webserver, it would be ideal. I think there are cases where people need to use Apache instead of IIS when IIS doesn't work well with other web languages."
"The solution should improve the cluster environment and load balancing."
"The solution is slow and could have better performance."
"The documentation isn't very good and the options are very complex."
"This solution needs to be easier for cases where you want to have an IIS cluster."
"IIS's memory management could be improved."
"The price of the solution could be less to improve."
"The login process could be improved."
"It can have automation features. Everybody is focused right now on automation. In terms of saving cost, automation is always the first thing that comes to light."
"It would be great if the product came with a feature where the remarks made on the board can be saved on an individual's laptop to make it more user-friendly."
"The solution sometimes crashed and had some compatibility issues with the DevOps JAR file."
"Logging-related issues in JBoss require improvement."
"The solution's pricing could be improved because it is not cheap."
"JBoss is not as reliable and stable as WebLogic."
"Having the support combined with Red Hat support would be an improvement."
IIS is ranked 4th in Application Server with 53 reviews while JBoss is ranked 3rd in Application Server with 23 reviews. IIS is rated 8.0, while JBoss is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JBoss writes "A flexible and stable solution that is cost-efficient compared to other products". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat and Microsoft .NET Framework, whereas JBoss is most compared with Tomcat, Oracle WebLogic Server, IBM WebSphere Application Server, Oracle GlassFish and TmaxSoft JEUS. See our IIS vs. JBoss report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
