We performed a comparison between IIS and Oracle SOA Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's very easy to publish."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use and easy to understand."
"The product is stable."
"The most valuable feature of IIS is it does not consume a lot of resources. It does not consume a lot of resources, such as memory."
"The solution is very stable. The solution is very simple and easy to use."
"The solution is very easy to use and offers a quick deployment."
"The tool shows us the operating systems where our servers and applications are running."
"The product is flexible."
"The most valuable feature of the facility, as the partner link, is to try to use third-party services and logic in your own vehicle to orchestrate the information."
"The ability to stand up a highly available SOA Suite, which has full DR capabilities, in a remote center and synchronize the databases using Data Guard."
"Enables our Product Manager to post products to different outside EC platforms with only one interface and one process."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."
"The new product has come out with SOA Cloud Service and Integration Analytics as well, which gives more options for clients to pick their point of requirements."
"What I like best about Oracle SOA Suite is Oracle support. I also like the tool features, especially the integration feature."
"Middleware jobs developing for EC, ERP, and shipping systems become easier."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle SOA Suite is all the platform's capabilities."
"IIS's memory management could be improved."
"The platform's stability could be better."
"It lacks a few performance improvement tools."
"IIS could improve by Microsoft Windows improving the update services. We would like to be able to update all systems that are connected. The WSA service has to be in good order to accomplish this."
"The price of the solution could be less to improve."
"The security must be improved."
"The solution's scalability needs improvement."
"The documentation of IIS could be better. They are not easily accessible. I had to use YouTube and other online resources to learn how to use the solution properly."
"They supply lots of documentation but finding what we need is challenging at times."
"The solution’s initial setup is complex and could be improved."
"An area for improvement in Oracle SOA Suite is the cost. It could be lower."
"The web services need to be more robust."
"The solutions can improve the communication or translations between formats, such as JSON and XML. The JSON REST API could improve."
"Its function options can be improved."
"An important area that can be improved is the product's data monitoring. When we use the solution for interfacing or end-to-end data monitoring, we want to know exactly where the data is going and exactly where it is failing, or where there is an issue."
"If the disk space expansion can be made more flexible, not requiring a database restart, it would be a major benefit."
IIS is ranked 1st in Application Infrastructure with 53 reviews while Oracle SOA Suite is ranked 8th in Application Infrastructure with 65 reviews. IIS is rated 8.0, while Oracle SOA Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle SOA Suite writes "Easy to setup, provides good support and scalable solution ". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat and JBoss, whereas Oracle SOA Suite is most compared with Mule ESB, WebLogic Suite, Apache Web Server, TIBCO ActiveMatrix and Microsoft .NET Framework. See our IIS vs. Oracle SOA Suite report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
