We performed a comparison between IIS and Oracle WebLogic Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool shows us the operating systems where our servers and applications are running."
"All the features of Microsoft IIS are valuable."
"IIS is easy to configure in terms of websites and other solutions."
"The solution is very simple to use and easy to deploy."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use and easy to understand."
"The solution has been reliable."
"The product is flexible."
"IIS is useful for the deployment of web applications...Its stability is good."
"What I like best about Oracle WebLogic Server is its integration with other software."
"The only difference is that Weblogic is lighter and consumes less memory."
"I recommend the product because the installation is easy, it provides a secure environment, and it's easy to manage. The solution provides easy monitoring. Accessing all the logs is easy, and deploying application versions is smooth."
"Oracle WebLogic Server is more secure and has full functionalities that can be used for big applications."
"Another valuable feature is the ability to automate tasks through scripts, making our environment highly efficient."
"Oracle WebLogic Server has a bunch of ready features that are easy to use and understand."
"One of the good features of Oracle WebLogic Server was the ability to add some custom parameters to its deployment and performance."
"The possibility of having several servers running, so we do not lose the service."
"There is an issue with the network. The tool's price is also high."
"It lacks a few performance improvement tools."
"IIS could improve the error logging. There are times we are not able to see the errors. More details would be helpful. Additionally, the configuring of the IIS should be allowed through coding instead of the classic view."
"The platform's stability could be better."
"IIS needs to improve its security. Its support needs to be faster and clear. The tool's licensing could be cheaper as well."
"Performance-wise, certain improvements in IIS are needed...IIS is not scalable. Its scalability is less."
"The initial setup could be made easier."
"IIS could improve by Microsoft Windows improving the update services. We would like to be able to update all systems that are connected. The WSA service has to be in good order to accomplish this."
"In the future, I would like to see better support for the REST interface."
"Licensing fees need improvement."
"Its pricing should be better. We are analyzing other options, such as JBoss, because of the cost of WebLogic."
"I can't point to anything missing."
"The administration is hard, and it is more complex to use than others."
"There's a bug related to the managed services."
"The cost could always be lower."
"Managing and monitoring the WebLogic server environment has been challenging because most monitoring tools don't support it."
IIS is ranked 4th in Application Server with 53 reviews while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 31 reviews. IIS is rated 8.0, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "Robust Java EE application server capabilities providing excellent stability and management features, but it comes with a potential downside of high licensing costs and a steeper learning curve". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Tomcat, JBoss and Microsoft .NET Framework, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with Tomcat, JBoss, Oracle Application Server, Oracle Fusion Middleware and Oracle GlassFish. See our IIS vs. Oracle WebLogic Server report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
