We performed a comparison between IIS and SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."The solution is very easy to use and offers a quick deployment."
"It's very easy to publish."
"We use Windows Server only for Eggplant Manager."
"Windows Server IIS is stable."
"It helps scan and mitigates our vulnerabilities using the best protocols to secure our environment."
"The solution is very stable. The solution is very simple and easy to use."
"What I like the most is that it is easy to use."
"The solution integrates well with most Microsoft products."
"They integrated it with the SAP router."
"Workflow functionality and internal portal capabilities are the most important features."
"From the use of this solution, we have been able to establish better processes and have greater management of our company."
"Internal workflow approval around ESS and MSS leave days, capex approval as well as internal communication to the business have improved the way my organization functions."
"Compared to Linux, the solution’s Windows patching is slower. I would like to improve it."
"We'd like future versions to be more stable."
"The solution's black box is not fast."
"I am using an older version of Windows Server IIS and the general management and navigation to get something done is not as straightforward as I hope it to be. The interface could be improved."
"The graphical user interface has room for improvement and can be more user-friendly."
"IIS could improve by having some features related to ASR and HTTPS certificate generation."
"Scalability issues and security concerns need attention from Microsoft."
"The tool needs to improve its performance."
"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly."
"We encountered stability issues, especially on external functionality around its RFP capabilities."
"Our customers expect that a page will open within one second, and I doubt this will happen. Also, opening documentation takes time. Fixing this will help the customer and help to meet their expectations."
"External portal functionality with suppliers and customers needs improvement."
"Due to our business, some setups were very complex."
More SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IIS is ranked 1st in Application Infrastructure with 53 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is ranked 20th in Application Infrastructure. IIS is rated 8.0, while SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal writes "The UI makes the setup easy to do from anywhere". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Tomcat, Oracle WebLogic Server and IBM WebSphere Message Broker, whereas SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework, NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, IBM DataPower Gateway and IBM WebSphere Application Server.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.