We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The interface, simplicity, and ease of management are all good features that make this user-friendly."
"Microsoft's technical support has always been very good."
"The solution is easy to use and connects with Microsoft."
"The solution is very stable. The solution is very simple and easy to use."
"IIS has a very simple and user-friendly interface, which helps a lot in effective and efficient management."
"The solution is very easy to use and offers a quick deployment."
"The solution integrates well with most Microsoft products."
"What I like the most is that it is easy to use."
"From the use of this solution, we have been able to establish better processes and have greater management of our company."
"They integrated it with the SAP router."
"If Microsoft IIS could work well with AppOptics or things like PHP, Python, and other custom languages that run on the webserver, it would be ideal. I think there are cases where people need to use Apache instead of IIS when IIS doesn't work well with other web languages."
"Scalability issues and security concerns need attention from Microsoft."
"The documentation isn't very good and the options are very complex."
"We've never had any issues with the solution, but it's still nice to have overall improvements on it. It could be easier and faster to use, for example."
"The documentation is not very detailed. They need to improve it and add to it. They should ensure there are lots of visuals to help users better understand the solution."
"The level of technical support the solution offers could be improved."
"Having no support for other than a Microsoft environment and programming languages limits the usage of IIS in many cases."
"In the next release, I would like to see better integration between the cloud environment and the on-premises environment."
"Our customers expect that a page will open within one second, and I doubt this will happen. Also, opening documentation takes time. Fixing this will help the customer and help to meet their expectations."
"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly."
"The price of the cloud system is a bit high."
"The cost of this solution is high."
"Because India is so competitive in the IT world, people will start to move away from SAP's pricing because they have a market monopoly. Soon, they will start losing the monopoly part to open source and other things. I don't think their monopoly will run for more than three to four years because people are getting away from these monopolies."
IIS is ranked 5th in Application Infrastructure with 8 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is ranked 14th in Application Infrastructure with 2 reviews. IIS is rated 8.2, while SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IIS writes "The interface, simplicity, and ease of management lend flexibility to this configurable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal writes "The UI makes the setup easy to do from anywhere". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Tomcat, Apache Web Server, Oracle WebLogic Server and IBM WebSphere Message Broker, whereas SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework, IBM DataPower Gateway, NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server and IBM BPM. See our IIS vs. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.