IKAN ALM vs Parasoft Development Testing Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IKAN ALM and Parasoft Development Testing Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The most valuable feature is code coverage.
Top Answer:The solution's speed has room for improvement.
Top Answer:We use the Parasoft Development Testing Platform to verify code coverage for static analysis in our unit tests.
Ranking
Views
60
Comparisons
33
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
200
Comparisons
154
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
217
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Parasoft Concerto, Parasoft DTP
Learn More
IKAN
Video Not Available
Overview
IKANALM is a web based, platform and environment independent DevOps solution. In the DevOps toolchain IKANALM starts where development stops and offers the ability to tailor your life cycle, project by project, has build, deploy, approval and notification capabilities using the unique IKANALM Phases concept. Through its integration facilities IKANALM is the perfect Orchestration tool to offer an end-to-end DevOps toolchain. By integrating with these toolchain tools it serves as an end-to-end DevOps Orchestration tool. Toolchain tools supported are: issue tracking, versioning, testing, containers… Last but not least, IKANALM has out-of-the-box DevOps solutions for IBM mainframe legacy systems, SAP, IBM Websphere and Oracle Data Integrator. IKANALM works on premise or can work Cloud based.

Parasoft DTP aggregates the results from across testing practices, providing intelligent and continuous monitoring of the testing outcomes for greater visibility into what is working — and what isn’t.  Includes:

- Comprehensive Reports & Dashboards

- Preconfigured compliance reporting

- Customized Advanced Analytics

- Interactive Navigation of Results

- Traceability

Sample Customers
Constellation Brands, USA/ GMF, France/ Reale Mutua, Italy/ Vivium, Belgium and TATA STEEL, Holland
General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Qualcomm, AAI Textron, Boeing, Fidelity, Johnson & Johnson, CIBC, Penske, Thales, Dell, 
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IKAN ALM is ranked 31st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews. IKAN ALM is rated 0.0, while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". IKAN ALM is most compared with , whereas Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.