JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management vs iMaint comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between iMaint and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Oracle and others in Enterprise Asset Management.
To learn more, read our detailed IFS Cloud Platform vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal.
Top Answer:I recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution a nine and a half out of ten.
Ranking
Views
82
Comparisons
83
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
200
Comparisons
169
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
355
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Learn More
DPSI
Video Not Available
Overview
iMaint is a comprehensive enterprise asset management (EAM) system for managing maintenance and assets--work orders, preventive maintenance, inventory, purchasing, personnel, projects, reporting and analysis, cost tracking and much more. Whether you're an individual site or a multi-site global enterprise, iMaint delivers powerful features at a reasonable cost. And it's easy to learn, administer, and maintain.
Oracle's JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management solution helps drive greater value from your assets, whether they are plants, facilities, or equipment. From capital planning and budgeting, to procurement and operations, to maintenance and repair. Oracle's JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Capital Asset Management provides you with complete visibility into your assets. It gives you the information you need to make the financial and operational decisions that optimize equipment performance from deployment through operations, maintenance, and retirement. Capital Asset Management is fully integrated with other key JD Edwards EnterpriseOne applications, including those that support the management of human capital, finances, procurement, projects, and services and warranties.
Sample Customers
Baldwin-Wallace College, Lantal Textiles, Ajax Textile Processing, Boride Engineered Abrasives, Bacova Guild, Owens-Illinois, Wisconsin State Fair, Community College of Allegheny County, Celestial Seasonings, GKN Sinter Metals
Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Label Technology Inc., The Conti Group, Roka Bioscience, Massimo Zanetti Beverage USA, City of Nashville
Buyer's Guide
IBM Maximo vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Maximo vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

iMaint is ranked 15th in Enterprise Asset Management while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is ranked 5th in Enterprise Asset Management with 4 reviews. iMaint is rated 0.0, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management writes "The product is reasonably priced and easy to set up, but the UI and UX need severe improvements". iMaint is most compared with , whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is most compared with IBM Maximo.

See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.