Compare NextLabs Dynamic Authorization vs. iMask

iMask is ranked 17th in Data Masking while NextLabs Dynamic Authorization is ranked 20th in Data Masking. iMask is rated 0, while NextLabs Dynamic Authorization is rated 0. On the other hand, iMask is most compared with , whereas NextLabs Dynamic Authorization is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
17th
out of 25 in Data Masking
Views
63
Comparisons
8
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
20th
out of 25 in Data Masking
Views
17
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Broadcom, Delphix and others in Data Masking. Updated: May 2020.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Learn
Mentis
Video Not Available
NextLabs
Overview

iMask is the first commercially available product to include dynamic data masking. It supports encryption, tokenization, and masking. It helps you, by allowing you to make templates containing the rules of masking and associated data and metadata. It can be deployed in a variety of ways.

Dynamic authorization is the core technology behind the NextLabs platform, in which authorization and access rights to an organization's network, applications, data, and other sensitive assets are granted dynamically in real-time via attribute-based access control (ABAC) policies.

Offer
Learn more about iMask
Learn more about NextLabs Dynamic Authorization
Sample Customers
Static and Dynamic Masking in a Canadian Aviation Company, Discovery and masking for a large credit rating agencyBAE Systems, Dow, e2v, Newport, CYTEC, Rockwell Collins
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Broadcom, Delphix and others in Data Masking. Updated: May 2020.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Data Masking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.