Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting vs iMask comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between iMask and Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Data Masking.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Masking Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Ranking
17th
out of 31 in Data Masking
Views
159
Comparisons
31
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
14th
out of 31 in Data Masking
Views
134
Comparisons
98
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Data Masking
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Data Masking. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting Pack
Learn More
Mentis
Video Not Available
Overview

iMask is the first commercially available product to include dynamic data masking. It supports encryption, tokenization, and masking. It helps you, by allowing you to make templates containing the rules of masking and associated data and metadata. It can be deployed in a variety of ways.

Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting extracts entire copies or subsets of application data from the database, and masks sensitive data so that the data can be safely shared with test, development, and partners.

Sample Customers
Static and Dynamic Masking in a Canadian Aviation Company, Discovery and masking for a large credit rating agency
IBVI, illycaffe, Scottish water, trueblue, AirAsia
Buyer's Guide
Data Masking
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Data Masking. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

iMask is ranked 17th in Data Masking while Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is ranked 14th in Data Masking. iMask is rated 0.0, while Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting writes "Stable with good support but the single-sign on could be improved". iMask is most compared with , whereas Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is most compared with IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and Oracle Advanced Security.

See our list of best Data Masking vendors.

We monitor all Data Masking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.