Compare Privacy Analytics Eclipse vs. iMask

iMask is ranked 20th in Data Masking while Privacy Analytics Eclipse is ranked 25th in Data Masking. iMask is rated 0, while Privacy Analytics Eclipse is rated 0. On the other hand, iMask is most compared with , whereas Privacy Analytics Eclipse is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
iMask Logo
18 views|5 comparisons
Privacy Analytics Eclipse Logo
4 views|2 comparisons
Ranking
20th
out of 25 in Data Masking
Views
18
Comparisons
5
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
25th
out of 25 in Data Masking
Views
4
Comparisons
2
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, IBM, Delphix and others in Data Masking. Updated: May 2020.
418,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Learn
Mentis
Video Not Available
Privacy Analytics
Overview

iMask is the first commercially available product to include dynamic data masking. It supports encryption, tokenization, and masking. It helps you, by allowing you to make templates containing the rules of masking and associated data and metadata. It can be deployed in a variety of ways.

Privacy Analytics Eclipse can de-identify structured data from a variety of sources.

It can be used to de-identify billions of records concurrently.

From large data warehouses to smaller datasets, Privacy Analytics Eclipse can manage many data concerns.

Offer
Learn more about iMask
Learn more about Privacy Analytics Eclipse
Sample Customers
Static and Dynamic Masking in a Canadian Aviation Company, Discovery and masking for a large credit rating agency
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, IBM, Delphix and others in Data Masking. Updated: May 2020.
418,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Data Masking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.