Compare Privitar Publisher vs. iMask

iMask is ranked 17th in Data Masking while Privitar Publisher is ranked 15th in Data Masking. iMask is rated 0, while Privitar Publisher is rated 0. On the other hand, iMask is most compared with , whereas Privitar Publisher is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
iMask Logo
63 views|8 comparisons
Privitar Publisher Logo
31 views|29 comparisons
Ranking
17th
out of 25 in Data Masking
Views
63
Comparisons
8
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
15th
out of 25 in Data Masking
Views
31
Comparisons
29
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Broadcom, Delphix and others in Data Masking. Updated: May 2020.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Learn
Mentis
Video Not Available
Privitar
Overview

iMask is the first commercially available product to include dynamic data masking. It supports encryption, tokenization, and masking. It helps you, by allowing you to make templates containing the rules of masking and associated data and metadata. It can be deployed in a variety of ways.

Delivering data-driven insights that fuel growth while achieving compliance for the sensitive data from your customers, partners and employees is hard, but it doesn’t have to be. With Privitar’s market-leading functionality and enterprise grade software, you can finally achieve both.

Offer
Learn more about iMask
Learn more about Privitar Publisher
Sample Customers
Static and Dynamic Masking in a Canadian Aviation Company, Discovery and masking for a large credit rating agencyNHS Digital
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Broadcom, Delphix and others in Data Masking. Updated: May 2020.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Data Masking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.